Re: Will my computer be able to run Diablo 3?
500-700 = medium
700+ = high
If I kept the stock settings I wouldn't have a problem at all using a 500W supply.
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/824/14/
291 W under load from the whole system with an i7 965
Besides that what do you mean with that last line? You're confusing me now
It's running at 4 GHz all the time and it's running fine and stable, does everything I want it to do.
First stepping (C0/C1) of 920's had some issues getting over 3.8GHz but with the D0 it's really easy getting 4 GHz or higher with a good heatsink.
back on the topic of DIII and system requirements :
I just read the SC2 articles again and I'm guessing that what Kalos came up with as requirements for SC2 will more than likely be very close to DIII.
They want to make it look nice but it's still blizzard, a company that wants "everyone" to enjoy the game.
-500 = lowI don't think so. I consider 620W to be high wattage. What sounds suspect is someone overclocking a 920 to 4ghz and actually being able to use it for some kind of function.
500-700 = medium
700+ = high
If I kept the stock settings I wouldn't have a problem at all using a 500W supply.
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/824/14/
291 W under load from the whole system with an i7 965
Besides that what do you mean with that last line? You're confusing me now
Bother? Much? It's easier than you thinkWhy would you bother overclocking your i7 so much, do you do a lot of video encoding or something?
back on the topic of DIII and system requirements :
I just read the SC2 articles again and I'm guessing that what Kalos came up with as requirements for SC2 will more than likely be very close to DIII.
They want to make it look nice but it's still blizzard, a company that wants "everyone" to enjoy the game.