Why go to mars?

BobCox2

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

It's the Off-Topic Forum, Don't expect your thread to stay On-Topic that long, I you want to steer it back offer something on-topic don't just cry about it.

I think robotic exploration of the Asteroid belt and the Atmosphere of Venus using Bio and Nano Tech packages could pay off in the near future better than a manned mars expedition can.
 
Last edited:

lAmebAdger

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

what do they hope to accomplish on mars anyway?

i don't see anything scientific about mars that a robot can't accomplish but a human can...

probably it's just for glory and all that crap

EDIT:
on second thought, bringing a human to mars and safely back again is a feat that in itself might advance us technologically...
 

Dondrei

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

I think the real question is, what do we hope to accomplish by doing anything else?
 

llad12

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

what do they hope to accomplish on mars anyway?

i don't see anything scientific about mars that a robot can't accomplish but a human can...
Yessire, those robots really haul fast on Mars ... especially when draggin a foot.

Whoops, gotta turn toward the sun on a 30 degree slope for the winter.

Cya later



 

BobCox2

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

Yessire, those robots really haul fast on Mars ... especially when draggin a foot.

Whoops, gotta turn toward the sun on a 30 degree slope for the winter.

Cya later
Much Later if your a robot.
How long would the manned mission stay and study, and even if they meet the profile laid down they can't exceed the missions length and then break a leg and keep working?
Oh and when a human breaks a leg out there it's a mission ending tragedy not a mission exceeded triumph.

*Perhaps the most important discovery was silica in Mars' soil that was uncovered by a dragging wheel on the Spirit rover. The mineral was seen as a likely product of a damp environment produced by hot springs or steam vents.

Or do you have a 5 year mission plan?

http://www.efluxmedia.com/news_Mars_rovers_exceed_all_expectations_to_mark_fifth_birthdays_32462.html *

The rovers had predicted life spans of just 90 days, but instead US space agency NASA this month marks the fifth anniversary of the mission that is still going strong.

What are the expected costs? etc.

"The American taxpayer was told three months for each rover was the prime mission plan, Ed Weiler, associate administrator for NASA's Science Mission Directorate said. "The twins have worked almost 20 times that long. That's an extraordinary return of investment in these challenging budgetary times."


http://www.perthobservatory.wa.gov.au/OurSolarSystem/assmt1/Yukiko%20Sunazuka.pdf

Your argument is one for robots, not against them, something you would know if you had bothered to look at the facts beforehand.


 

Dondrei

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

lead fulfilled lives?
rest in peace?
Well true, at least by dying you're doing something constructive for the future of the race. Now if you could just convince the third world and everywhere else with a baby boom to do the same.



 

llad12

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

Your argument is one for robots, not against them, something you would know if you had bothered to look at the facts beforehand.
When robots can climb up a long 45 degree rocky slope and/or visit a Martian gully that recently flowed without tipping over, lemme know.

When robots can climb up 25' on a near-vertical outcrop to obtain a sample of Martian gypsum with a curious green tinge(?), I will be impressed.

Until then ... Oops, some fool just drove me blindly into a sand trap, give me a month to extricate myself.



 
Last edited:

lAmebAdger

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

do you expect humans to reach mars (with safe travel back)
before robots become that advanced or not?
 

lAmebAdger

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

the robots don't have to but the humans do, which is kind of implied in my question up there...

humans are nowadays more efficient than robots in anything BUT they are a pain to get anywhere far...

robots aren't such a pain to get anywhere but obviously a pain to get to do anything big...

the question is: will humans getting to mars and back safely and successfully come first or will robots becoming so advanced that they aren't frickin crippled turtles on planet mars come first?
 

BobCox2

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

Safe Travel back is not even in some of the current plans,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manned_mission_to_Mars#The_One_Person.2C_One_Way_Mission_Option
I don't think you understand how fragile humans are (Solar Flares kill everyone unlike a Earth to Moon mission the window is bigger for this and shielding costs) compared to robot's it will take 20 or so robot missions just to get the supply dumps out there for the 1-5 month on-site manned mission.
The Cheap seats are a 1 way trip.
And how is a robot that was meant to last 90 days lasting 5 years anything but a Ninja Turtle?
 

TheOgreMan

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Why go to mars?

I'm of two opinions on this:

Why not go to Mars? Prove that it can be done. Send people there, take good surveys, look into places that robots will have a hard time doing themselves (drilling into the crust, on-site testings, etc.). If we could send people there it would create a huge funding opportunity for many, many people. Research into space travel, living accommodations, anything related to it would surge.

Then again...

Why even ask why to go? Don't. There are enough problems here on Earth that need to be taken care of before we invest huge sums of money into a task of that magnitude. People all over the world are without health care, food, proper shelter, clean water. Earth's resources need better management, over-population needs to come under control, war is always occurring. If we can't solve (relatively) simple problems like this on our own home turf...why should we send people out into space? If anything it would cause more conflict and create more enemies than there currently are. Property rights of new lands, criminal outposts, you name it, it could happen.

I suggest we solve one problem at a time. First, let's find some clean, renewable, efficient energy. Then let's feed the hungry. Then let's go to space. It'd be nice to punch a zergling in the face.
 
Top