What a set of tools...
Well, the Bush government is at it again. Despite proof, and eye-witnesses, Rice denies that she ever was told of attacks on the US, 2 months before 9/11. She says:
Well, the Bush government is at it again. Despite proof, and eye-witnesses, Rice denies that she ever was told of attacks on the US, 2 months before 9/11. She says:
You don't have to be an expert in grammar, logic or even english to know that that sentence makes no sense whatsoever. However, this next statement is even more ludicrous...Speaking to reporters late Sunday en route to the Middle East, Rice said she had no recollection of what she called "the supposed meeting."
"What I'm quite certain of, is that it was not a meeting in which I was told that there was an impending attack and I refused to respond," she said.
Regardless - the point is - if I didn't do my job because 'i was fairly sure that the situation in that meeting was not that I needed to not do my job' I'd be fired. Why are these people still there? Why? Why? :banghead:The briefing "didn't say within the United States," said one former senior intelligence official. "It said on the United States, which could mean a ship, an embassy or inside the United States."