Well, I guess he loses the *** vote Linkeroo I guess what bothers me the most is that the last time the Constitution was amended to enforce a specific lifestyle choice on U.S. citizens, it didn't go too well - lousy Prohibition. This bit is funny, though: Yes, because married, *** mobs will be recruiting more and more gays; thereby resulting in a country of homosexuals; spare me. Serious consequences? Is that like double secret probation? And seriously, he needs to stop bringing up the phrase 'Activist Judges'. I mean, Activist Judges got him in the White House in the first place. So, any chance of this being ratified? I'm going to say no. There's no need for an amendment, let the individual states decide. Oh wait, what's that part of the Constitution that says states have to abide by the rulings of other states?