Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Support the site! Become a Diablo: IncGamers PAL - Remove ads and more!

Transcript: Developer Live Chat, 10 February, 2015

Discussion in 'Diablo 3 General Discussion' started by Flux, Feb 11, 2015.

  1. Flux

    Flux Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    6,710
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    472
    Flux Submitted a news story

    Transcript: Developer Live Chat, 10 February, 2015

    [​IMG]The Reaper of Souls developer Live chat went off this afternoon with Nevalistis moderating a conversation with Don Vu, Wyatt Cheng, and Travis Day.

    The planned topic was Seasons, and they talked about that, and got into a lot of other issues and fan questions as well. Topics included: adding more levels of Torment difficulty, the new (upcoming) Item Sets, improvements to existing legendary items, fixes to single-target skills, and much more.

    We took a rough transcript during the show, and will polish it when the video is posted for review. Click through for a bullet by bullet list of the main topics covered. The full session is also available on video, at the bottom of this post.



    Transcript: Developer Live Chat, 10 February, 2015. Sorted by topics for easier absorption.


    Seasons



    • Seasons are meant to provide a sense of community, as everyone starts over from scratch together. Like sharing a common goal and purpose.
    • The devs hope S2 is a bit less about initial leveling speed and rushing, after S1 (in Softcore, at least) was ruined by bounty exploits. They also think the v2.1.2 changes to Rifts, including higher/more consistent density, better layouts, and more even distribution of Pylons should make Greater Rift success feel less about the luck of the layout/monster type/pylons.
    • Future Seasons should be shorter than the 5 months that Season One lasted. No definite length was stated, and it will vary depending on patch development.
    • They again confirmed that future Seasons should be spaced around patches, with new patches generally launching after a Season ends, giving players a week or two to experiment with the patch changes before the next season begins.
    • Wyatt Cheng stated that with Leaderboards there may be too much focus on Greater Rifts. No concrete changes planned, but they want the game to give more acknowledgement to accomplishments than just GRs.
    • In regards to Seasonal Legendary Items, they were pretty happy with how the S1 items worked out, and hope to continue that in S2. The three new Legendary Gems are exclusive to Season Two on purpose, to provide an incentive to play Season.
    • They've considered making some more radical changes to Seasons, possibly in shorter term Seasons that would be almost experimental. Such as making it impossible to heal at all (presumably they meant via health potions).








    General Issues



    • The much-hated Realm of Trials was defended. Devs know lots of fans don't like doing them, but the devs think the waves are useful to sort players to the correct level of Greater Rift. Especially in multiplayer games, where with the Realm of Trials, everyone is guaranteed to enter the same, appropriate, level of Greater Rift.
    • The common issue of all single-target skills being underpowered came up and the devs agree with the issue, but no imminent changes to game mechanics. They will be adding buffs to various single item skills via items and sets. (One example is the Mighty Belt coming in Season Two that grants simultaneously all rune effects to the Barbarian's Frenzy skill.)
    • Common requests for Bounties to be improved are being considered, but nothing to announce. Devs are aware that players mostly do them just trying to find a Ring of Royal Grandeur with a good random affix, and that grind gets boring.
    • The recent buff to two-handed weapons made them viable (some fans would say 2H is now too powerful) but the devs like the current balance of 2H vs. dual, and aren't planning to tweak it further.
    • The Console has a "Nemesis" system where a monster that kills a player can travel and show up in their friends' games. This is cool on the console, but not coming to the PC any time soon.
    • The much hated "too low" 500 Blood Shard cap comes up in meetings all the time, but the devs hold to their "othewise noobs wouldn't notice they even had Blood Shards" excuse that Travis Day laid out in our Blizzcon interview. They might implement a way to increase the cap, but no promises on that yet.
    • Another common fan request, for higher levels of Torment difficulty, is discussed regularly, but they have no plans to go up to T8 or T10 or further. They feel that more levels of Torment would take away from the specialness and challenge of higher Greater Rifts.
    • Forgotten souls are too rare initially and too common eventually, but no fixes are yet in place for this issue.
    • Trading got a lot of conversation, with reminiscences about how it worked in Diablo 2. The devs don't want to bring that back in D3 since they think it would short circuit the item hunt, making it too easy to gear up too quickly, and then there's no more discovering of self upgrading. They also shot down adding trading in clans for the same reason, and also since they think it would turn clan mates into item source utilities, instead of friends to play with.
    • The devs are okay with some classes and builds working as support, since they think it can add some variety and teamwork.
    • Gambling requests for specific one-handed and two-handed gambling options were shot down since they think it's more fun with players sometimes finding new/different weapons that they wouldn't have used otherwise.
    • A common Quality of Life request is a DPS meter that would show how much damage a character is actually doing, since the current character window and DPS doesn't incorporate +elemental% or +skill% damage. The devs say that's not in the works.
    • Requests for auto-pickup of crafting materials and gems were denied since the devs think players would feel disconnected from the process and not even notice they were picking stuff up. (Maybe we could get auto-pickup on those, but with a really annoying hardcap that was much too low?)
    • On a related question about adding more uses for crafting materials in the long run, the devs said it's something they want to do, but nothing to announce yet.




    Legendary Items



    [caption id="attachment_381509" align="alignright" width="250"][​IMG] Skull Grasp and Gungdo Gear.[/caption]
    • Ancient Items aren't perfect, but the devs like that they add some more complexity to the item pool. They came about when heavy duty players (like dev John Yang) had all teh gear they wanted just weeks into a season and no real prospect for further upgrades. There are no current plans for a tier of gear higher than Ancient.
    • As mentioned at Blizzcon, they're adding legendary affixes to a lot of legendary rings that are now just stat sticks, trying to create more competition in that slot. The legendary ring with rotating bonuses to elemental damage type mentioned in the Blizzcon Workshop workshop is a go and is already usable in the internal build. (Set rings Focus and Restraint are also being reworked, but nothing imminent.)
    • To reply to a question about why not more good legendary affixes on Mighty Weapons (or all class-specific items), the devs said it's something they're working on, but so far they've focused their time on item types that all classes can use.
    • Complaints about builds that only work thanks to legendary powers on legacy items, which can not be found anymore, are a thing. The devs don't mind legacy items working in some cool ways, but they might enable new items that do the same things, so these would be available to everyone.




    Item Sets




    • The devs again confirmed that they want to buff all the original five class-sets (Natalya's, Iron King's, Zunimassa's, Tal Rasha's, Inna's) to make them comparable to the currently-BiS six-piece sets, but those aren't imminent. These sets will probably have additional items added to make them six-piece sets (IK already is 6 while the others are all 5), and they mentioned that a new item has been added to Tal Rasha's.

      [caption id="attachment_382839" align="alignright" width="250"][​IMG] Thousand Storms set buff preview.[/caption]
    • The Monk's Thousand Storms set was said to be gaining a cool proc when used with Dashing Strike. It's not ready yet, but has changed in design a lot from the initial preview. (Pic to the right.)
    • In reply to a question about adding more two-item sets, the devs said nothing was in the works. (They did say that improvements to the never-used two-ring set Focus and Restraint were being planned, but not real soon.)
    • Talking about the v2.2.0 coming new Barbarian set, which was testable at Blizzcon last year and based around Whirlwind and Rend. The theory is that the Barb should feel vulnerable when he stops WWing to cast Rend, and thus change up the gameplay. (I didn't think the set design worked very well, in my Blizzcon testing.)



    The chat was pretty good, if a bit heavier on "yeah that's an issue we're working on it" than most fans wanted to hear. Did you guys listen? Any thoughts?


    Update: The Twitch archiving must have choked since the video wasn't posted until a day after the chat, and then only via YouTube.
    Continue reading the Original Story
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2015
  2. bruteMax

    bruteMax IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2012
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    6
    I appreciated their frankness regarding the lack of item diversity in some areas, like rings.

    At the same time I was frustrated that they think gambling for weapons is fine as is because we can find other weapons that may be of interest other than the one we were initially aiming for. This would be true if there was a broad diversity of weapons, but that sadly is another area where item diversity is lacking. :(

    Other than that it was pretty much what I expected.
     
  3. Goatking

    Goatking IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2014
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    "The much-hated Realm of Trials was defended"

    Blizz sure likes to keep hammering the same nail. It continues to serve up a dish of frustration to players and will never meet Blizz's expected goals...
     
  4. dezzo

    dezzo IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    ... difficulty slider for realm of trials... wtf is wrong with that idea?
     
  5. HardRock

    HardRock IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    4,343
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    356
    Or simply let us choose between doing another trial or getting the same level keystone as last time. That would help a TON for solo play. After doing 2 or 3 of these I usually know my character's limit pretty well, I don't need to do more until I find better gear. But yeah, a slider that would allow us to start at a specific level would be great as well.
     
  6. HardRock

    HardRock IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    4,343
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    356
    I'm fairly sure now that there are other reasons for these features other than the one they stated. I refuse to believe that people who can put together a game can be so... I don't even want to say. The reasons given for the BS cap (BS indeed) and material autopickup were especially infuriating. Guess what devs, I notice every potion that was auto-picked up by my character and it bothers me every time.
     
  7. Catastrophe

    Catastrophe IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    153
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    42
    "Common requests for Bounties to be improved are being considered, but nothing to announce."

    "On a related question about adding more uses for crafting materials in the long run, the devs said it’s something they want to do, but nothing to announce yet."

    "They might implement a way to increase the cap, but no promises on that yet."

    So in the expansion we'll see an interesting, major change to the bounty system. They'll also add a third sink like the Mystic and Blacksmith for us to sink our crafting mats into.

    And finally, if you order the digital deluxe edition then your blood shard limit is increased to 1000. (Since that's how they 'sold' us the additional character slots last time.)
     
  8. Kingu

    Kingu IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2009
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Blood shards: We have designers who can't read tooltips, they have to ask.
    I ask what kind of designers are they...
     
  9. HardRock

    HardRock IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    4,343
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    356
    Tunnel vision implies that they can still see or read feedback. On some issues at least I'm seriously beginning to doubt that. Sure, many of the problems brought up here are smallish, but their responses are mind-boggling nonetheless.
     
  10. Muggs

    Muggs Clan Officer - US West Hardcore

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,249
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Their reasons for not wanting to do things just shows what a disconnect they have with their player base. "We like you have to click on things". How is this even a actual response or damn just give us a little counter like they have for gold and problem solved. Because I can tell you when you have 7k gems finding a few more does absolutely nothing to connect me further to the game. The same goes for all the rest of the mats in the game. Eventually it is just a total that sits in my stash and I don't really care how much I am picking up as a go.

    What we got was the typical political double speak we get from blizzard time in and time out. I am not sure what I was expecting from the devs but it seems that these dev talks are a waste of time since they are only confirming what we already know.
     
  11. Timesink

    Timesink IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2008
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Reading between the lines I'm going to summarize my take away from this transcript.

    "We actually know there are a bunch of issues but we want to save most of the real changes for the next expansion so we have something to market. Patch chances will be minimal band-aids."

    Harsh but that's how I read it.
     
  12. HardRock

    HardRock IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    4,343
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    356
    I think the real reason for all the clicking is that the devs feel that automating the process would break the reward loop, specifically the routine part. That's what they really mean by "connection to the game". Remember, Blizzard employs psychologists (of course they call them User Experience Researchers) and part of their job is to help the design teams with in-game features: http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/careers/posting.html?id=1400047

    Since addiction became a positive word in the gaming media (some games are even marketed as such and reviews also say it like it's a positive thing) why shouldn't game companies cash in?

    The reasoning behind the BS cap is probably similar. By hoarding Blood Shards you aren't getting rewarded, again braking the reward loop. By introducing the cap they are forcing you to run back to town for your potential Legendaries or else lose out by wasting Shards. Loss aversion is a powerful incentive. See, they aren't really worried about us forgetting Blood Shards, they worry because we may forget about the reward. If they ever raise the BS cap I wouldn't be surprised if at the same time they would slightly raise the amount of BS that drops.
     
  13. Blanchard

    Blanchard IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2013
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Welp, that was pointless. I wonder how long they'll keep doing these livechats when they seem to just be pissing off the entire community with their responses to feedback?
     
  14. MathewPoland

    MathewPoland IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    33
    That's some next level BS right there... I thought that with Josh Mosqueira as the head of the project, Diablo 3 is going to go in the right direction, but they're god damn stuck on their weird "we know everyone wants it, but no, because no" attitude.

    As for BS... Allow Kadala to sell Blood Shard Bags that increase your BS cap b 500 and cost 100 BS each. Cap problem solved, people happy, noobs safe, because they still have to find Kadala to even buy the extended cap.
     
  15. Maldin

    Maldin IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    2
    MatthewPoland wrote:
    "As for BS… Allow Kadala to sell Blood Shard Bags that increase your BS cap b 500 and cost 100 BS each. Cap problem solved, people happy, noobs safe, because they still have to find Kadala to even buy the extended cap."

    There you go! I like that idea. Be sure to post it to the Bizz boards.
     
  16. SnoopyBrown

    SnoopyBrown IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    How about meeting us halfway? Can't we at least get rid of the "combine gem" timing bar? That thing kills me. Sooooo much wasted time. :)
     
  17. SnoopyBrown

    SnoopyBrown IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    HardRock... I think you're spot on!
     
  18. DaTruth

    DaTruth IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My guess is that it's a difference in the goal of the difficulty system. Rather than scaling highest difficulties crazy high, they implemented the GR system, which scales infinitely. If you want a challenge, you have the option to do that. For those who aren't looking for a challenge, many builds are relatively T6 efficient, allowing players to both experiment and be mostly efficient. Doing it in this manner allows there to be a reasonable ceiling on how much you have to play to be able to efficiently farm the highest difficulty, while still offering those who want more an option for that.

    I often tie this back to the way D2 was. Hell mode wasn't really that difficult at all, and there were many builds that were decently efficient for farming (there were certainly a handful of top tier builds). This meant that a player didn't have to sacrifice a ton of efficiency to do something different. If there were more torment levels in D3 currently, it would only choke out the limited diversity that currently exists to the the highest level farming content.

    I'm more of a fan of them adding more game difficulty independent game mode, like greater rifts. Something that isn't timed would be nice, as it would both allow for more defensive builds and would be a change of pace in general. The point though, is that the more you scale things out of control, the fewer available builds that will be available.
     
  19. DaTruth

    DaTruth IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2014
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hopefully this will change in 2.2, as they are adding some new sets and revising some of the current sets that are underutilized. Fingers crossed.
     
  20. Muggs

    Muggs Clan Officer - US West Hardcore

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,249
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    124
    If this is the case then Blizz has followed TV and Radio with an appeal to the LCD which is very unfortunate.
     

Share This Page