Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Support the site! Become a Diablo: IncGamers PAL - Remove ads and more!

Time

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by {KOW}Spazed, Oct 1, 2006.

  1. {KOW}Spazed

    {KOW}Spazed Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Messages:
    11,578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Time

    I'm spinning a Chat into a thread.

    Is time a dimension? Is it a real thing or did humans just make it up to help convey thoughts and organize data in our heads?


    I don't think time is real, I think we made it up to help make sense of the world. The idea of it is the basis of our methods of thought and ties in well with our natural memory.

    All of our measurements of time are based off of measuring length.
     
  2. Gertlex

    Gertlex Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,912
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My calendar says nothing about it being time for me to fry my brain trying to figure out time.
     
  3. WebDragon

    WebDragon IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,818
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Talking about time, maybe its time you fixed your tar? :hide:
     
  4. Freet

    Freet IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    466
    As we discussed in a previous thread, my contention is that time is our way of sectionalizing our existance which was a necessary part of organizing our lives.

    Does it exist? Only in our minds. The real question is whether that is enough to give it 'exists' status.
     
  5. ogogo on ice

    ogogo on ice IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    77
    I think time is an actual thing that exists, but that may be because I can't wrap my brain around it. I agree that its a way to measure things, but without time, what would movement be? There would be no difference between something like acceleration and velocity or position, because you need time for those to be different. I think that physics is close enough to correct that time is necessary and actually a dimension.
     
  6. {KOW}Spazed

    {KOW}Spazed Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Messages:
    11,578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This sums up what I think nicely.

    WD: My 'tar is a piece of OTF history, it shall remain unchanged.


    OOI: There is no difference, something can only be going one speed at any given instant.
     
  7. llad12

    llad12 IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    6,189
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Some say that time is the 4th dimension as things must endure in order to exist. Others say that time is simply change.

    I would go into this more, but, damn ... look at the time!

    Gotta go!

    :wink:
     
  8. xXxXshadowXxXx

    xXxXshadowXxXx IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I actually remember arguing with my religion/philosophy teacher about time. I had argued it was something we made up as a measurement. He first replied with, see this desk? it has a width. I had replied yes but we made it that width in ## cm.

    He then said, but the point is it HAS a width. It was then basically ended with him saying Einstein prooved time existed in his formula..He also walked away then -_-"
     
  9. Merick

    Merick IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    6,862
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    466
    As I said in chat:
    2d beings would say the third dimension is time. As would 5d beings the 6th.
    Entropy always increases over time. This is a measureable physical difference between past and future, i.e. not a subjective human thought. Not to mention causality.
     
  10. WebDragon

    WebDragon IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,818
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    I just wanna see the ol' boy dancing again. Gives a face for the victory dance of pant stealage. :jig:
     
  11. Stompwampa

    Stompwampa IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    4,322
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    466
    I would say that a dimension can only be so if it has always been so. And it must also be measurable.
    Height, width and depth have always been a part of existance. Plus, they are quite easily measured. Therefore, it would be easy to call those "dimensions."
    Time, by the term we know it today, has only been in existance since we started measuring it and breaking it up into comprehensive pieces. However, "time" other than what we know it as today, has always existed. If it were not for time, nothing could live, die, move or think.
    I think that our means of measuring time is man-made, but time itself is not.
    And since time is measureable, I would draw the conclusion that it is a dimension.
     
  12. {KOW}Spazed

    {KOW}Spazed Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Messages:
    11,578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    See that is where I disagree, I think time is strictly a way to deal with memory. It makes it easier to sort things out in our minds. However, it cannot be measured because all the ways we measure it are based on another dimension(length).
     
  13. Stompwampa

    Stompwampa IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    4,322
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    466

    how so?

    so you refute the existance of time then?
     
  14. Quietus

    Quietus IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    Messages:
    5,470
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    346

    Are you suggesting, then, that all of our lives are happening at one instant, a blip on some universal span, and that our memories are things that have no perception of time, but that we organize them, subconsciously, into being so? If that's the case, then why, for example, do I not have any memories of things that haven't happened yet? Why would nothing that's going on in my life now have been affected by things that happen in my future? If time didn't exist, then that implies that all things are happening at the exact same moment, and so nothing could be completely free of influence from things that we percieve as being "Before" and "after".

    I say that time does exist, just as height, width, and depth do - and that our methods of measuring it are our way of taking control of our world in such a way that we can interact with it. Even without measurements, time would still exist. Cave men still saw the sun travel through the sky, they still knew that they would have to get their food before it went back down, else they wouldn't be able to see. Just because they didn't necessarily measure hours, and minutes, the way that we do, doesn't mean that they didn't percieve time's passing.
     
  15. ragnar_ii

    ragnar_ii IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,492
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    Time is a dimension. You cant say an object is at coordinates x,y,z and know where it is. x,y,z exists in all time. You need to say what the time is to know the exact position.

    As for the measurements of time being a measurement of length, well that length is the distance that light travels one meter. That means it involves the speed of light. Speed has units of distance/time. So, in a way its using its self to define itself. So, yes our definition sucks, but I cant think of a better one, but time still exists as a dimension.
     
  16. Dondrei

    Dondrei IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    36,855
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    467
    Anything can be a dimension if you want it to be. If you don't believe me, then first answer this question; what is a dimension? And no, it's not where Krang comes from.

    Well, only if they could move back in time as easily as forward. Time is distinct from the spatial dimensions in that it only goes one way (although actually, on a philosophical level that's not necessarily true, but we'll stick with a physics perspective I think).

    There's no reason to suppose either.

    How do you know the same isn't true of height, width and depth?
     
  17. {KOW}Spazed

    {KOW}Spazed Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Messages:
    11,578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How do you know you don't know them? There are people out there that say they can predict the future, maybe they can just access the memories easier. I'm saying there are no instances, just movement in space.

    Cave men might not have understood the concept of time, but that doesn't mean they can't use it. Lots of people can't describe how computers work, but they still use them.


    Gah it is really hard to put into words my actual argument, language is too closely tied with the concept of time to really show it.
     
  18. bladesyz

    bladesyz IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    People couldn't measure height, width, and depth either before rulers were invented.

    Bidirectional movement along a dimension is overrated. By the scale of the cosmos, we are irrevocably tied to our planet. The movements we make are insignificant compared to the distances crossed by Earth and the Solar System through the galaxy. We are, therefore, still bound toward moving in a specific direction, just like Time.
     
  19. Stompwampa

    Stompwampa IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    4,322
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    466

    I knew someone was going to bring that up...i just didn't want to get into it.
    Technically, nothing existed before we had a name and definition for it. I could say that trees have only existed since we gave them the name and defintion of "tree." But in reality, we all know that to be false. The same could be said of height, width or depth. We all know that those things have been around since the beginning of existance, but only since we've been able to define and measure them have they existed in our lives as tangible ideas. The same can be said about time.
    This is very much edging closer to a debate about extistentialism...
     
  20. bladesyz

    bladesyz IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    2,027
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Let's look at it another way:

    What's the purpose of dimensions? To be able to measure and qualify objects. Does time fulfill that purpose? Yes. In fact, sometimes knowing Time is more important than knowing any of the other 3 dimensions.

    Suppose I need to get from home to work. Does it matter to me exactly how far the workplace is? No. It only matters to me how long it takes me to get there depending on my transportation of choice. The same distance is going to vary depending on whether I take the car or the bus, or if there's a traffic jam.

    Thus, Time is as useful a dimension as the other three.
     

Share This Page