Latest Diablo 3 News
Support the site! Become a Diablo: IncGamers PAL - Remove ads and more!

Thoughts on the European Union constitution?

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Amra, Jun 1, 2005.

  1. Amra

    Amra Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    7,262
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    474
    Thoughts on the European Union constitution?

    I am not completly up to speed on this but it seems like it's passage faces an uphill battle now. Or maybe it's dead already.

    How do the OTF folks in Europe feel about this?
     
  2. nrabbit

    nrabbit Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,368
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    166
    can you put some info about the european union constitution? something really brief
     
  3. Darnoc

    Darnoc Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    It isnt dead, but since two of the founding nations didn't vote the constitution in, it will have to be amended in some way. The Dutch are worried about losing their *ahem* freedoms under a united states-like union and are still upset about the devaluing of their currency when they were forced to accept the euro.

    The French vote was closer, but still decidedly no. Some of the voiced concerns by the french were that the government that would be in control of the union would be too powerful and there werent enough ways to check it's decisions and power under this constitution. Many people in France simply voted no because the EU union is something that Chirac wanted and they don't like him or want him in power- the french pm has already resigned; kind of a sign that chirac is on his way out unless he pulls a rabbit out of his hat.

    While the EU union constitution is very similar to the US constitution, it obviously would control more and needs to be drafted to give the individual countries more say in what happens in their homelands if it is to be accepted. Also, many people feel that this consolidation is happening too fast with the currency change and constitution and all. Of course there will always be people resistant to change. Basically, european countries want the international pull they would get united, but don't want to really unite in the way the United states are; they kinda wanna try the articles of confederation way first. Wont we ever learn from our mistakes? :)
     
  4. kryo

    kryo Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    42
    Yeah, a kind of similar that's not. The EUC ranges from the low 300's to well over 400 pages in length (depending on language). The original USC is four pages long, and it only takes a few more pages to cover the ammendments since then.

    If they ever plan to pass that thing, they really need to thin it down big-time. With a gargantuan bureacratic cleveland steamer like that, it's no surprise that almost anyone can find a reason in there to vote against it.
     
  5. Machina

    Machina Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,425
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    255
    In its present form I believe it's dead, as Darnoc said, with two founding members voting no it's as good as dead as it stands, added to that the UK would have voted no anyway (if only it were the UK who just voted and not France, then Tony will have just stepped down instead of the French PM, maybe...). The only way forward if they want to keep the constitution is to drastically change it.

    If it came to it, I believe the UK would sooner leave Europe than be part of a 'super state', and in the short term they most certainly wont be joining the single currency, unless Tony wishes to go out with a bang.

    The problem with the constitution is that whenever it's debated the content is never mentioned in the UK. We basically debate whether we want to be part of a European state, or merely part of a European trading forum, and that's the same for almost any European issue.

    Personally I would have voted no, but then again, that's because I want the UK to retain its own unwritten constitution, and not be dictated but unelected representatives in Brussels.
     
  6. axeil

    axeil Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    We'll eventually see a United States of Europe. It's been inexorably heading towards that since the end of WWII.
     
  7. Johnny

    Johnny Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The European union is a big peice of crap all together. I spit on it and its constitution.
     
  8. Machina

    Machina Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,425
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    255
    How many nations would be part of a European superstate though, I can't see the UK being the only country to pull out if it got that far, and then how powerful would a European superstate actually be in reality?

    If Europe fears being left behind by the rest of the modern world then a superstate really isn't the solution to that problem.
     
  9. Johnny

    Johnny Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Europe doesnt have an opinion. Europe is alot of countries who all have different opinions but who are together lead by a handfull of people who all have one thing in common. They like to fill thier pockets with money and so a union is formed.
     
  10. axeil

    axeil Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    Good question. I only know a fair deal about this since this year's AP European History Document Based Question was to describe the progress of European Unification from the close of WWII to the Collapse of Communism.

    Essentially what the documents outlined were the following countries getting involved: UK, France, W. Germany (with reservations from the UK and France for obvious reasons), Belgium, Netherlands, Denmark, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Austria?.

    But today I would venture a guess that the majority of Eastern Europe (minus Russia) plus the Balkan States would be in the Union. To explain Russia's exclusion it would require a lot of time that I unfortunetly don't have right now.
     
  11. Machina

    Machina Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,425
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    255
    I agree, that's why I don't think a superstate can form from Europe, let alone function if one were to form.
     
  12. Garbad_the_Weak

    Garbad_the_Weak Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Messages:
    4,082
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Learn from our mistake - don't do it. Just keep trade open, a common currency, and military alliances as needed. Keep your courts and laws local. No matter what checks you put in, when you centralize you outsource authority, and sooner or later your rights will get reduced.

    Garbad

    EDIT: And I can't see how you think euro was different than the US when it was formed. The only difference I can see was a common language.
     
  13. axeil

    axeil Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,513
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    Well the USA did have to have a massive alliance with all 12 colonial "states" to defeat the British, thus laying the groundwork for a unification. Additionally, the heritage of the majority of the colonists was the same (British), again making life easier.

    Europe has a greater number of problems to overcome such as: animosity over past wars, most notably the World Wars; language barriers, cultural barriers, etc.
     
  14. PublicEnemy

    PublicEnemy Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    United we stand,divided we fall
    Even though the european countries have different languages,customs and cultures,they still have one religion (christianity) and a common past.They had better remember the past wars before saying "no".
     
  15. SirKnightmare

    SirKnightmare Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    656
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    346
    The EU needs to really unite to compete with the US economically. Divided they don't have a shot. Since I'm an American things seem to be going my way.
     
  16. Freemason

    Freemason Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I find the failure of the EU to be highly amusing. The French voted against it with fear of the "Polish Plumber" and the Dutch said no for fear of losing the drugs and hookers.

    Two countries voting NO and the Euro dropped like a rock. Those poor fools that shorted the Euro are going to have to eat the loss. Shouldn't have turned their back on the US dollar. :lol:
     
  17. jimmyboy

    jimmyboy Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,551
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    Funny how the French and Germans co-authored the EU Constitusion.

    The EU is toast. And Europe is going to get squeeze by the Americans and the Chinese.
     
  18. Freemason

    Freemason Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Anybody paying attention could see it coming. The French can't pass us the opportunity to stab somebody in the back. Not even themselves.

    And ain't it a shame? The EU was created to go after the US economically. And just like the Soviets, they failed in the face of rampant capitalism. Evil Conservative Warmongering Capitalism.
     
  19. Anakha1

    Anakha1 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2003
    Messages:
    10,368
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    *sigh* :rolleyes:

    Yes, I forgot. Smeg thinks that a nation making a decision with its inalienable right to sovereignty is a stab in the back because they've disagreed with the U.S. in the past. How rational.
     
  20. DaviddeJong

    DaviddeJong Diabloii.Net Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,003
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    120
    First of all, we didn't fear losing our drugs and hookers. (Although it would be a shame if we did!) The no-voters (I was in favour of the constitution) wanted to voice their opposition to our current government and fear a Turkish membership and immigration (which is a solid argument IMO, just not to oppose the constitution).

    Secondly, I don't think the Euro will be down for a long time. Our economy (the EU's not the dutch) is steady, the US budget deficit is really big (isn't it?) and Europe has a trade surplus.

    If we'll ever see a European superstate I'm sure GB won't "pull" it. It's not like they have enormous power in the EU and they're not the biggest economy either.

    David.
     

Share This Page