jmervyn said:
Your statement is extraordinarily foolish (and perhaps contradictory to something you stated earlier, though I don't have time to reread these threads), but I suppose I should have expected that.
When you penetrate an organization, you don't display the mole. You use the mole to disclose enemy activity, then use means that don't betray his or her existence to carry out the actions. Infiltration isn't the same as co-option and puppet rulership.
Having a mole or two isn't penetration to the deepest levels either, it's guessing which member you can safely offer to buy and buying him.
And you really can't tag them in the nuts too many times before they figure out they have a mole in their midst, which they have done. Now with the shift in tactics it's only a matter of time until he gets dug out if the strikes keep up.
This isn't deep penetration no matter how you slice it. If it were there would be advanced knowledge of planned attacks rather than once a month figuring out where a leader is going to be for the next half hour. Israeli intelligence might be good, but as far as deep penetration of Hamas, there's absolutely nothing to suggest they even might have it.