Almighty Cow said:
This post is mostly addressed to BIGeyedBUG.
I agree with HBeachBabe. It, in my definition of the word, cannot be considered a cheat because it is allowed in the game. If I understand you correctly, then anything not in the "spirit of the rules," so to speak, is considered a cheat.
The problem I have with that is that I personally would have to consider ATMA under that interpretation. Single player DII was never "meant" to have a way to mule items, outside of Open or TC/PIP games. ATMA serves as a way to circumvent that restriction. It's a third party program that alters the time commitment necessary to the game. One could argue that it saves time and that you could do it eventually by yourself. Well, that's the same argument botters use.
Please note that I'm not arguing against the use of ATMA. I love ATMA, and I'm glad this community allows for and encourages the use of such a wonderful program. I just think that if you're a strict adherent to the idea of the "spirit of the rules," you can't accept ATMA. Course, that's just my opinion. I'd be interested to hear what the counterarguments are.
In short, I consider the gold exploit a bug much like Marrowalks or GA/pierce. Cheesy, but people'll likely use it anyway. It's more or less up to the forum community to determine what is or isn't acceptable. Unethical, maybe, but not a cheat. <shrugs>
I look forward to continued debate on the subject.
I think the use of ATMA is a subject that's been better covered elsewhere, but I'll offer you two approaches to that concern.
1. If you look at SP as being a seperate game from Realms Diablo, then yes, it definitely is a cheat. No way around it, for reasons that you articulated very well. Not just by my definition, but also I think, by HBeachBabe's (who I'm sure will speak up if I'm stepping on her/his toes). However, if you say that there really is only one Diablo game, just broken up into different populations, then it allows you some wiggle-room. ATMA's basic muling use gives SPs no more than Realms players have easily at there disposal. In fact, it does no more than make a cumbersome process in SP without a 3rd party program much easier, and even pleasant to use. I think this is the position of the SPF, and by extension dii.net.
2. If I ever finish one of my Assassin journals, I will have the this notification somewhere in it: "I cheated in the following ways:". At the top of the short list that follows will be this sentence: "I used ATMA for muling."
My point is, that using ATMA is cheating as far as I'm concerned. While I don't think it makes the economic premise of DII into drivel in quite the same way, as Gold Without Risk, there's no getting out of the fact that it has an impact, and probably a bigger one materially than Grinding will ever have. I just don't care about it in the way I do Grinding. ATMA adds to the pleasure of the game in many ways for me, and that's what I'm in it for. So I'm a cheater--at least in that small aspect of the game, which is no more than a tiny part of my life in general.
What I really dislike is when people say, "What I do is [positive or neutral description], anything beyond that is [negative description]. And yes, you can put "taking advantage of a bug" and "cheating" into those boxes respectively--but people do it all the time in much more serious situations. Intellectual and terminological honesty is important, even more so in regards to oneself than to ones opinions of others. Really, the second should follow from the first, right?
So thats approach #2. #1 is much more pleasant overall.