Ana said:
unemployment... the people that work in the "war industry" will become unemployed and don't tell me "we'll give them other jobs"...
Don't have to. I can point to history itself. Shortly after WW2 there was a boom in manufacturing and production, why? b/c all the steel that had been goign to bombs was now available for things like cars. In fact, there were far more jobs after the war than durning it, despite the returning soldiers.
My dad works for a co that manufacuters music equipment. Belive it or not but the same people who make speakers and amplifiers on the assembly line also turn out gituar parts and microphones. And several of those workers came from a paper mill that closed down nearby. Paper = drums?? Not logical! but it's true. Knowledge of heavy eqipment operation trancesnds what is produced. Instead of armor, TVs. Instead of Humvees, sedans.
Now, on to the specailists. My husband will serve as a perfect example.
Goltar is an Areospace programer. His company gets contrats from the millitary and at a recent show nearby that I attened the 2 largests booths were for NASA and the Air Force. But while they had the largest booths, and the biggest draws, they were far and away swallowed by the rest of the show. I know for a fact that goltar would get a huge kick out of designing a new space shuttle system, one that's not 20 years out of date. But this is a back burner to the gov. why? millitary spending.
As for research. Well when I was little my mom worked for a university biology deartment, one of the biggest funders was the US millitary. It was popular in the 80s to wrte your proposials with an eye to making it sound good to the Army or Navy b/c that's where the money was. They would have been just as glad to write their proposials to the NAS (national acedemy of sciences) if it had the kinda of grant money available that the military had.
SO in essecne where would the "lost" jobs come from? Where they always do, they wouldn't be lost in the first place.