Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Support the site! Become a Diablo: IncGamers PAL - Remove ads and more!

Let's talk about prisoner abuse!

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by IDupedInMyPants, Mar 26, 2005.

  1. IDupedInMyPants

    IDupedInMyPants Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,522
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Let's talk about prisoner abuse!

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...20050326/ap_on_re_mi_ea/prisoner_abuse_iraq_9

    That's really all I've got, I just didn't want this to get buried under the Schiavo non-story. I find it a little cute that Congress stepped into baseball and Schiavo to prop those stories up right as the military was legally forced to reveal the tip of this iceburg.

    If documents released under a FOIA request are revealing new cases of prisoner abuse, how much more widespread is this? When and to what extent do you think it will affect our PR efforts among our allies? How do these actions check the spread of WMD, defend America, or promote freedom or democracy?
     
  2. llad12

    llad12 IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    6,189
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    466
    I am not surprised at this report. It fits into a pattern of widespread systemic abuse of prisoners that we have seen at Abu Ghraib, Afghanistan, and Gitmo Bay.

    IMO, those who should be ultimately responsible for these abuses will never accept it or be charged in their role. The only ones who will be punished will be the low men on the totem pole ... the grunts and perhaps a few lower-ranking officers.

    -----------

    Fox News adds a little more to your article:

     
  3. DrunkCajun

    DrunkCajun Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    5,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, since some constitution-hating, freedom-loathing, authoritarian-loving right winger is going to do it anyway:

    Screw them! I think what the troops did was great and they should keep doing it! Who cares about the prisoners, they're all terrorist and would do far worse to us!

    Bah.
     
  4. MithrandirX

    MithrandirX IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2003
    Messages:
    993
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165

    Next time, this guy will probably just kill them to avoid prisoner "abuse" scandals.
     
  5. Steve_Kow

    Steve_Kow Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,860
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    While I didn't bother to read the article--stripping and humiliating looters was often done by Arabs who organized themselves to protect their neighborhoods. I.E it's a common practice for those people.
     
  6. Drosselmeier

    Drosselmeier IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    5,168
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Even if that is true, what does it have to do with anything?
     
  7. ScanMan

    ScanMan IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    120

    Hello Duped,

    From you link:

    According to the report, the abuse included:

    _ Forcing detainees to perform exercises such as deep knee bends for hours on end, to the point of exhaustion.

    _ Blowing cigarette smoke into the sandbags the prisoners were forced to wear as hoods.

    _ Throwing cold water on the prisoners in a room that was between 40 degrees and 50 degrees.

    _ Blasting the detainees with heavy-metal music, yelling at them and banging on doors and ammunition cans.

    If this is what entails "prisoner abuse" in the eyes of the press, my response is a big "so what".

    Oh yeah, let me include a "big ****ing deal".

    How do you suggest that we treat imprisioned bad guys? Should we treat them as bad guys, or should we arrage for hookers to give them blow jobs in hope that they might give up vital info in the throes of orgasm?
     
  8. IDupedInMyPants

    IDupedInMyPants Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,522
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually it's abuse in the eyes of whatever soldier wrote that particular report, so I'll assume that you hate the troops. I'm also gonna go out on a limb and guess that his point of reference for defining abusive activity came from stuff like the Geneva Convention and internal definitions of abuse since it was an internal investigation. All I'd suggest is we stick to our obligations, one of which the Geneva Convention is. At the very least I'd think we'd all want to treat captured combatants the same way we'd like our combatants to be treated if captured.

    If you're looking for me to say it, yes, subjecting someone to those things for hours at a time every day would indeed be torturous, one of them is even potentially deadly. If that's your idea of a good time then consider this my idea of taking back my RSVP for your Christmas party.

    Edit: Just out of curiosity, if a parent were on trial for child abuse and it was documented that he did those things to his child, would you say he's guilty or not guilty?
     
  9. ScanMan

    ScanMan IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    120
    Hmmm....let's see....if the parents suspected the kid was going to go off and gun down a bunch of his classmates then I would have to say no.

    I guesss it's all relative: prisoners captured as enemy combatants under the provisions of the Geneva Conventions (in the uniform of the enemy) should be treated as POW's under the rules of those conventions. Those who do not meet the specifications of "enemy combatants" under the Conventions should be treated as the Conventions say they should: summary execution.

    Exactly what is the "uniform" of those blowing up civilians in Iraq?
     
  10. Moosashi

    Moosashi IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,711
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    120
    Not to condone the abuse described in the article in any way, but how do you get people to talk about their suspected terrorist activity if the worst you can threaten them with is cold water and loud music, and even that's illegal? It seems to me that if you want prisoners, who hate everything you stand for, to tell you what you want to know you have to have leverage, i.e threats you can make good on. If making prisoners sufficiently uncomfortable to talk isn't ok, then we have to be satisfied with poor intelligence. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
     
  11. Sokar Rostau

    Sokar Rostau IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,142
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    467
    Kind of sums up America...
     
  12. Drosselmeier

    Drosselmeier IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    5,168
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Information gathered using torture is not good intelligence. If I tortured you good and proper I could probably make you confess you masterminded Oklahoma City bombing.

    Capturing suspected terrorists and interrogating them using these methods is just stupid. Most of them will confess something I bet, even though they might not have done anything.

    EDIT: Uhhh... Spelling. Bedtime.
     
  13. ScanMan

    ScanMan IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    120
    That's correct...we should subject them to the punishment perscribed under Geneva......

    Summary Execution.
     
  14. maccool

    maccool IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,904
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    165
    Hilarious! What you're saying amounts to, "we don't know who they are, but they look funny so we get to shoot them."

    If those damn insurgents would just dress up proper. Well, until Jmerv gets here with his (in my opinion) increasingly irrational response, I'll make do:

    They obviously deserve it. That Duped speaks of Freedom of Information and Democracy obviously means he's a terrorist. It is your duty to capture him. Dissent should not be tolerated.
     
  15. ScanMan

    ScanMan IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    120
    That's correct...research the Conventions as to the treatment of "irregulars"

    What the Conventions say is that anyone who is "under arms" in a combat area is treated by the laws of combat.....and anyone who is "under arms" who is out of uniform is a spy or an irregular, and therefore subject to summary execution after being captured.
     
  16. olie0923

    olie0923 IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    First off, the soldiers who are doing this aren't doing it b/c they think it is cool and fun. They are/were being directed to do it from higher up. Yes, there are a few who would do it just b/c but you would have that in ANY military. If anyone should be punished for the actions it should be the higher ups (ie: colonels, generals, etc.).

    If it appears as if they are having fun then it is probably their way of dealing with it. I'm not saying that some of them don't get off on it but I seriously doubt if all of them do.

    As far as torturing prisoners.......torturing prisoners for information is an ancient tactic used by all militaries to gain information. It has been used forever and will continue to be used, at least until they make something to read someone's mind. So, I don't really see how that can be considered stupid.
     
  17. SassyChickyMomma

    SassyChickyMomma IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11

    not to mention, look at the torture our own soldiers have been put through over the many years in the many wars and conflicts. my dad told us horrific stories of the awful crimes against nature that he saw in viet nam. *(i wont go into detail about soldiers hung upside down naked with their testicles in their mouths!)* but the media has a way of turning our citizens against our military men and women. the things that were done to those prisoners, no doubt, it was terrible. but it was also nothing compared to what we have seen in our own history and our soldiers do not deserve to be treated like monsters.
     
  18. IDupedInMyPants

    IDupedInMyPants Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,522
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    1) The ones who torture prisoners do indeed deserve to be treated like monsters, because they are monsters.

    2) I'm not really following your reasoning. You're essentially saying that we have carte blanche to do it forever because it happened to us a few times in Vietnam. That's like saying a woman got raped once so all women have the right to go out and chop men's balls off.

    And Scanman, if you want to summarily execute people who are summarily executable under the Geneva Convention, by all means knock yourself out. Once they're taken prisoner, however, there are rules. "Summarily" tends to imply a fairly brief window of oppurtunity, in that it would have to be done pretty much immediately to be considered summary. Just because you could have killed them at one point and chose not to doesn't mean you can do anything you want with them later on, that's pretty much the entire point of the Convention and any set of engagement rules that have ever been drawn up.
     
  19. maccool

    maccool IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,904
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    165

    That may be the case sensu stricto and I can't dispute your personal interpretation of international laws. But the U.S. public was sold on a totally different reason for kicking the **** out of of same lame ass country. The 4th reason if memory serves. The reason after WMD, imminent threat, crazy dictator.

    Shouldn't we - by we, I mean people who have the honor to serve and defend idiots like you and me - err on the side of caution? That seems like it would win more hearts and minds than panties on the head.
     
  20. SassyChickyMomma

    SassyChickyMomma IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    first off, they are not monsters. they are soldiers defending our freedoms and our homeland. second, they deserve better representation in this whole mess considering that they are merely pawns in the generals game of chess. third, you took my post out of context. i do not think that we can act out any disgusting war crimes because of viet nam, OR THE OTHER COUNTLESS WARS & MILITARY ENGAGEMENTS, i am saying that the media is blowing this junk WAY out of context and that americans do not deserve the reputation for being grotesque animals. and like i said earlier, it IS terrible. but it is not NEW. the way it is being treated is like "oh my how could they do something like that!?" as in we are the first country to do it. i am not saying that it is right, or even acceptable. but i am saying it is the price of war. and as olie and many before him said, the soldiers were ordered to do it, so they are not the only ones that have to be held accountable, but even more so the chain of command should be dealt with accordingly.

    AND don't get me started on the whole September 11th tragedy! my god, these guys got royal treatment compared to what OUR CITIZENS went through!
     

Share This Page