Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Support the site! Become a Diablo: IncGamers PAL - Remove ads and more!

Kerry, Catholicism, and Abortion (a/k/a The Mother of All Threads) o

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Munch, Feb 6, 2004.

  1. Munch

    Munch IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    77
    Kerry, Catholicism, and Abortion (a/k/a The Mother of All Threads)

    Catholics Attack Kerry on Abortion Stance

    Oddly enough, yours truly here has e-mailed Sen. Kerry twice in the last week asking about this exact same topic. The response has been thundering silence (surprise!).

    As a Catholic pro-life Democrat, there are very few candidates out there that champion all of my beliefs and causes. In fact, I can count all of them on the fingers on my third hand (i.e. zero). There's always going to be a handful of issues that various Democrats are going to disagree on - that's the nature (and probably its downfall) of the party. Kerry's stance as being pro-choice does not bother me - I haven't seen a pro-life Democrat in my voting lifetime. (BTW, I think a pro-life, pro-gun Democrat could win 40 of 50 states.) But his being Catholic and pro-choice is very confusing. Here's his justification:

    and;
    It's a fairly neutral stance that I can buy into. But is it hypocritical? Can he say he tries to keep his church and his state seperate, but still vote on these issues? Would it be less hypocritical if he excused himself from such votes (as a senator, of course - presidents seldom have that option)?
     
  2. Anakha1

    Anakha1 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2003
    Messages:
    10,368
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think it's a damn good stance to go on. I don't think a politician should allow his personal beliefs to interfere too much into his or her decisions, but rather should do what's best for the people. Naturally, that becomes a problem in cases like this. Freedom, however, and that includes over one's own body, should always take presedence.

    Church and state are supposed to be seperate and way too many politicians (read: 99.9999% of them) ignore that (ie. Bush). I never thought I'd see one who actually tries to follow that fundamental rule. I have more respect for Kerry now than I ever did.
     
  3. advil

    advil IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    26
    i think not.

    and there's a sizable catholic population that would agree with kerry's stance.

    it's simple and easy to believe that abortion is wrong but that the government should not be involved (in banning it).
     
  4. Munch

    Munch IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    77
    Good responses. Thanks.

    I also wanted to add that I think this thread should stay away from the *** marriage content of the linked article. There's another thread currently active on that if anyone does want to comment.
     
  5. mouschi

    mouschi IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2003
    Messages:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    57
    I like Kerry a lot more after reading that. No politician should allow his religion to interfere with what is right, even though that never really happens. It would be interesting to see if he would stick to that if he was elected.
     
  6. Ash Housewares

    Ash Housewares IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    21,802
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    467
    I agree completely, I'm Catholic but I'm pro-choice because I'm not going to let my faith prohibit the actions of non-catholics, so I agree completely with his stance. He has to keep church and state separate since them protestants is crazy buggers that think a catholic president=pope runs the U.S.
     

Share This Page