Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Support the site! Become a Diablo: IncGamers PAL - Remove ads and more!

It's Official: Apple Moves to Intel

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Steel_Avatar, Jun 6, 2005.

  1. Steel_Avatar

    Steel_Avatar IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    It's Official: Apple Moves to Intel

    Yahoo

    And Neowin.net, which is unfortunately bogged down right now, had live text updates from the WWDC, which stated that Jobs not only confirmed the move to Intel, but that they were moving to the x86 architecture.
     
  2. Suicidal Zebra

    Suicidal Zebra IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,391
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    120
    *cries a little inside*
     
  3. DrunkCajun

    DrunkCajun Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    5,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can someone explain, in English, what this means?
     
  4. Steel_Avatar

    Steel_Avatar IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    It means that Steve, who for years was running 'selected Photoshop filters', is going to have to find a new way to spin the fact that he's now using the same processors he claimed were so outclassed by the G5 the previous year.

    What I am surprised at is MS' statement that they will develop versions of Office for the new x86 Macs.

    Jobs also announced Rosetta, a real-time binary instruction translator, that apparently can be used to run PPC code on an Intel Mac at nearly normal speeds. This definitely impresses me. They're also releasing XCode 2.1, which can compile fat binaries; Steve is saying that both architectures will be supported for 'a long time to come'.

    I'm very interested to see if MacOS X will run on commodity hardware. If it will, I might be convinced to get myself a copy to see how it runs.
     
  5. DrunkCajun

    DrunkCajun Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    5,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That looked like English, and the words even made sense, but I read it and felt no more enlightened that I was originally.

    How will this impact me, a Mac user?
     
  6. Steel_Avatar

    Steel_Avatar IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Not much, at first.

    But this is how I see it:

    If MacOS X86 runs on commodity hardware, or is readily available, developers will stop writing for the PPC (hand tuned AltiVec, for example). Why would, say, Adobe invest so much extra in writing a PPC-tuned version of Photoshop, when they can just release the x86 compiled binary, which would run on the Intel Macs?

    But you, a PPC user, might be up the creek.

    You're not a Macolyte, so this isn't going to completely shake your worldview ;) But for some folks (no names here . . . ), who have been touting the superiority of not only MacOS, but also the underlying hardware itself, this is a big deal. Remember that Steve Jobs has spent years (with the G4 and the G5), claiming that the particular PPC CPU in question is so much more powerful than a P4. And he always 'proved' this by running selected Photoshop filters and cooked benchmarks.

    And Macolytes loved him for it. Now he has to explain to them that he's switching to Intel processors, the same ones he spent years trashing. It'll be interesting to see their reactions, although I'll bet that they'll eat up whatever he says. The man could **** in a pretty plastic box, and they'd buy it by the millions.
     
  7. {KOW}Spazed

    {KOW}Spazed Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Messages:
    11,578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Only if I can plug my iPod into it.



    I am fairly pissed.
     
  8. MixedVariety

    MixedVariety Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,498
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Eventually there will be just one big Company, called Macinsoft, or perhaps Microtosh.

    This is only the beginning.
     
  9. {KOW}Spazed

    {KOW}Spazed Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Messages:
    11,578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well we have Wintel now, so it would have to become something like Macrinsoft.
     
  10. farting bob

    farting bob Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    6,129
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, the 1 company in the future will be called Mc-int-soft-mart.
    Anyway, i think as with most stories as they come out, people fear the worst, and the odds are in 5 years time everything will be lovely at mac, with even more ipods.
     
  11. Amra

    Amra IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    7,255
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    472
    So how should I feel about this? Should I still plan on switching to a mac?

    ???

    Oh, I wouldn't be switching anytime soon. Probably not for months (unless there is some reason to change sooner?).
     
  12. mhl12

    mhl12 IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,970
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    466
    It's not really gonna affect the mac at all really. If you're switching for just the outside looks and the operating system, theres really almost no difference. The only thing changing is the processor i think.
     
  13. Steel_Avatar

    Steel_Avatar IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    I disagree. This will hurt PPC development at best, and at worst sink it. Think about it.

    If a developer can save money by simply developing an x86 version of an application, and just compile for the Windows API and the MacOS X86 environment, why would they bother compiling and testing for PPC as well? The first one requires only one set up of code, and any hand tuned assembly would be portable. Developing for a PPC core would require hand written AltiVec that couldn't be ported.

    For example, see Adobe. If they could focus on compiling and optimising only an x86 version of Photoshop, such as hand coded assembly and SSE / SSE 2 / SSE 3 instructions, and it would function on Macs and x86 systems, why spend the extra money and time on an AltiVec version for PPC systems?

    Although if you really want a Mac, Amra, I wouldn't be surprised if prices drop precipitously in the coming months. Apple may have just Osborne'd themselves. At least they have the iPod to keep them going.
     
  14. DurfBarian

    DurfBarian IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,707
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    467
    This surprised me too, at first, but then again MS sees Mac Office as a "get out of jail free" card it can use when it's accused of monopolistic practices and predatory pricing and stuff.

    Don't hold your breath. Apple is and will remain for many years a hardware company, and they'll do what they can to keep OS X running on Apple machines only. I don't doubt that some hackers will come up with a BIOS kludge to get it running on certain beige boxes, but it's going to be unsupported.

    On the other hand, I understand that Windows will run on the MacTel hardware. So you could just get yourself a Centrino PowerBook next time you're in the market for a new machine. :D

    It's a good thing that Apple has more than $6 billion in cash right now, because they're going to burn through at least a quarter of it when their sales go into the toilet for the next year. I was going to make a new purchase soon, but now it looks like I'll be waiting for a MacTel machine running 10.5 late next year instead.

    Steel: This development kills PPC for the PC market. But I think IBM is going to be quite happy developing POWER chips for their heavy iron and, oh, I dunno, the PPC-based chips that will go into all three new gaming consoles. I think those might be worth a bit of money to the company. ;)

    Amra: You might be able to get a fantastic deal on a used Mac, since lots of people will be panicking and selling their machines in preparation for the new stuff. (I know a few people who are buying nice monitors and cheap Mac Minis to use for the time being, with the plan to get a new machine once they come out.) PPC will be supported in Apple's software for some years to come, so anything you get now will be usable for a while. But if you can afford to wait, waiting until an Intel-based Mac comes on the market will probably ensure that what you get will be compatible with the newest software for many more years into the future.
     
  15. Steel_Avatar

    Steel_Avatar IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Durf: I agree that the PPC iron market isn't going away; I guess I should have been more specific. I meant that MacOS development for the PPC core is going to go down the ****ter.

    And you're right about Apple having to burn through that warchest.

    Interestingly enough, I've read comments from Apple muckitymucks that say that the new Mactel boxes will not use the Open Firmware approach used in the current Mac boxes. This leads me to believe, again, that Apple will be using an off-the-shelf CPU from Intel, and not a new proprietary design.

    And if that kludge ever hits Bittorrent, you bet I'd download it to try it out :) Perhaps Apple will have to get used to mass-market piracy :p
     
  16. DurfBarian

    DurfBarian IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,707
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    467
    Well yeah, since Apple is instructing developers to stop developing PPC-specific stuff. The list of requirements for Rosetta is pretty frightening to folks who've been doing PPC software for a while:
    (source)

    Yeah, but there's lots of things you can do to a motherboard to make sure it's an approved setup for the software to run on. There's interesting stuff in this post and the comments that follow it, including:
     
  17. Steel_Avatar

    Steel_Avatar IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    I saw that too. The only thing is, it runs smack up against the issue I was talking about earlier. Apple is a small customer compared to the overall number of chips Intel ships per year. Are they really going to be willing to shell out the money to design such a chip, test it, and then set up one of their fabs to make the things? And even once they start runs, Intel seemingly always has issues with yields in their first runs of a line. I just don't see all that happening within a year.

    At least IBM had the Power4 and 5 series that could benefit from development work on the PowerPC 970.

    And yeah, that list of things Rosetta won't do pretty much screams: "It won't run anything, so might as well switch to developing for the new IA."


    PS: I've seen you all over the Ars forum thread about this :)
     
  18. Ranger14

    Ranger14 IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,397
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    From http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/ quoting Jobs.

    I don't know, it doesn't sound like it is going to be that big of deal, though it means I will want to wait a year now to buy a new laptop. :(

    What's the surprise about Microsoft developing office for the new systems? They've done it for the existing systems and they do have a vested interest in Apple.
     
  19. Steel_Avatar

    Steel_Avatar IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    The surprise is that except for Apple, Adobe and MS are basically the only things propping up OS X. *dodges Macolytes*. Take either of the latter two away, and the platform will eventually wither and die.

    What this means is that honestly, before today, MS could have easily finished off Apple at any time, simply by stopping development for Mac Office.

    However, Apple will now be running on similar if not identical hardware to the armies of boxes running Windows. Now Apple is in direct competition with MS, whereas before MS could kind of smile and say, "Oh aren't they cute."

    So I'm surprised that MS would help Apple compete with them.
     
  20. DurfBarian

    DurfBarian IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,707
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    467
    No, that's my evil twin, I swear. :D

    Ranger: If you're really hurting for a new machine (are you still on that old colorful iBook?) it won't harm you to get a G4 iBook. That'll work just fine with Tiger, and certainly Leopard, and probably whatever they call 10.6, too. Whatever you buy now will serve you will in OS X for years to come.

    I definitely understand the "was going to buy soon but might as well wait for the newer stuff" feeling, though.
     

Share This Page