Speaking of hands over your ears, are you being dense or just difficult? With your history, I suspect the latter. My point is that Amnesty makes mountains out of Western molehills and then stands atop them screaming obscenity, while all but ignoring far greater abuses simply because they don't have any traction with monsters.
Does it invalidate their work? Not at all. But screaming bloody murder to anyone who will listen because some of those self-same monsters have been discomforted, while dropping a report of the most horrific acts that can be perpetrated upon humans into a filing cabinet and saying 'ho, hum' not only substantiates their bias but evidences their cowardice. If they <were> morally superior, they'd be screaming about the countries or companies giving support to the monsters, rather than throwing feces at the good guys because they're not quite spotless.
Amnesty pretty much doesn't bother because countries like Saudi Arabia, Russia, or China might be mean to them instead of making excuses. The same sort of logic that the Dutch government appears to be applying to Geert Wilders. Look hard enough and you'll find imperfection, but if you claim to be a watchdog, harping on imperfections or conjuring offenses rather than attending to the catastrophic is clear malpractice IMO.
