Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Support the site! Become a Diablo: IncGamers PAL - Remove ads and more!

impossible ring?

Discussion in 'Theorycrafting and Statistics' started by consufed, Apr 28, 2008.

  1. consufed

    consufed IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    impossible ring?

    so I found this rare ring from baal with the following stats:
    +9 to maximum damage
    replenish life +9
    +90 to mana
    25 % poison length reduction

    Now here is where I'm confused; the arreat summit says rare rings can only get 3-4 max damage and up to 60 mana. So am I reading something wrong, or is the fact that it's a drop from baal make it super awesome like that. If so, is there a correct list of affixes that a ilvl 99 rare can get somewhere?
    Any help would be appreciated.
     
  2. Arkardo

    Arkardo IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    3,035
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    467
  3. consufed

    consufed IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Re: impossible ring?

    errrr... I see I did read the great wyrm's wrong, but doesn't the following mean that the mod will only grant 3-4 max damage on a ring?
    Rings(42)[3-4]
    from the summit "The numbers in Brackets (level)[number] show the range of bonus for that level." Am I reading it wrong ?never mind, just realized it was +9 to minimum damage and not max.
     
  4. omgwtfbbqpwned

    omgwtfbbqpwned IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Messages:
    7,044
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    166
  5. Arkardo

    Arkardo IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    3,035
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    467
    Re: impossible ring?

    Yeah, you're right there, my bad. Probably another mistake from Arreat's side. It should probably have read something like "Rings(42)[3-4](43)[3-12]".

    EDIT: omgwtfbbqpwned by omgwtfbbqpwned
     

Share This Page