Hypocrites?
What about people who claim to hate cheaters/cheats/dupers/dupes/whatever, but still trade for duped runes when they know they're dupes? Hypocrites or what?
Yes, the "No, I had nooo idea that this cham/zod-rune was a dupe"-argument seems to be the way some people clear the conscience (does the low trade values for high runes ring a bell maybe?). And of course the really bad arguments: "Someone else duped the runes - I'm not guilty of anything!" and "Everyone else does!".
I have my opinion about this, and I think it's hypocrisy. Even though I badly want an Ohm and a Sur for a Bramble I will not build the armor until I've found the runes myself. If I never find them (and if none of my friends find them) I will never get a Bramble.
Even though upgrading the runes make them permanent I don't think it's ok and more "legit" than actually duping the runes.
What do you think?
What about people who claim to hate cheaters/cheats/dupers/dupes/whatever, but still trade for duped runes when they know they're dupes? Hypocrites or what?
Yes, the "No, I had nooo idea that this cham/zod-rune was a dupe"-argument seems to be the way some people clear the conscience (does the low trade values for high runes ring a bell maybe?). And of course the really bad arguments: "Someone else duped the runes - I'm not guilty of anything!" and "Everyone else does!".
I have my opinion about this, and I think it's hypocrisy. Even though I badly want an Ohm and a Sur for a Bramble I will not build the armor until I've found the runes myself. If I never find them (and if none of my friends find them) I will never get a Bramble.
Even though upgrading the runes make them permanent I don't think it's ok and more "legit" than actually duping the runes.
What do you think?