Hunger: Azurewrath vs Stormlash Many people have approved using Azurewrath as the ideal Hunger weapon, so I thought I'd see what everyone else thought. In my opinion though, it just seemed like one of those items that looks good on paper: Stormlash: "6-Frame Hunger" One-Hand Damage: (10-12) To (272-320) (141-166 Avg) +50% Damage To Undead Adds 1-473 Lightning Damage +30% Increased Attack Speed +33% Chance of Crushing Blow 20% Chance To Cast Level 18 Tornado On Striking 15% Chance To Cast Level 10 Static Field On Striking +3-9 Lightning Absorb (varies) Attacker Takes Lightning Damage of 30 Azurewrath "5-Frame Hunger" One-Hand Damage: (102-114) To (115-129) (108.5-121.5 Avg) +30% Increased Attack Speed Adds 250-500 Magic Damage Adds 250-500 Cold Damage, 10 sec. Duration (Normal) +1 To All Skills +5-10 To All Attributes (varies) Level 10-13 Sanctuary Aura When Equipped (varies) Indestructible +3 To Light Radius The Facts: All right, for starts, lets just weed out the bs. -lil' elemental+magic damage is sorbed and neglibible in hell-for both weaps. -+skillz are of minor importance in this build -Stormlash-->slower, but higher avg damage -Azurewrath-->faster, lower avg damage -Azurewrath-->no crushing blow -Stormlash-->mucho crushing blow + Static Shock ^^ diagnosis: imo, in a build where u need all the mods and damage u can get, stormlash packs more punch with both cb and shock. Sanctuary is helpful with leeching and has its uses, but this build just needs all the damage it can get and I don't think elemental/magic damage is the way to go....maybe in nm u'll pwn where its not so sorbed, but not hell. Unless someone can really prove to me that Azurewrath was phenomenal in hell?