How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

krischan

Europe Trade Moderator
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

There is no lens. It's a part of the simulation. The scientist also doesn't really have eyes or a physical body, at least not the one he believes to have in the simulation. He might be nothing but a brain in a glass, with cables attached to it, to feed the brain with what it believes to be sensory perceptions.

BTW, you cannot look through an electron microscope like through a regular microscope, but that doesn't matter with respect to this discussion.
 

buttershug

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

You don't have to simulate the actual atoms, you just feed the scientist's brain the impression of looking through an electron microscope.
If you are not talking about the movie then you don't even need the scientist.

There was a web page about the "brain in a vat" that claimed to have the solution to if you could tell is you are one or not. But they goofed it up in the first or second paragraph.

I didn't appreciate your level of distaste for the movie until recently.



 

Dondrei

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

The only good bit is when Keanu Reeves says "how about I give you the finger and you give me my phone call?".

Oh, and every scene with Hugo Weaving.

So you put a jpeg at the lens? How does that account for manipulation of the object?
You couldn't do any of this by manipulating optical input, far too difficult and inefficient, I was assuming you were sending impulses directly into the brain.



 

Johnny

Banned
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

You couldn't do any of this by manipulating optical input, far too difficult and inefficient, I was assuming you were sending impulses directly into the brain.
Nooo I mean to reduce the power needed in order to make a perfect simulation for the scientists. What parts would the machines be able to remove and still keep it realistic.

Meanwhile I totaly want this bust



 

buttershug

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

Nooo I mean to reduce the power needed in order to make a perfect simulation for the scientists. What parts would the machines be able to remove and still keep it realistic.

Meanwhile I totaly want this bust
All of them. You sound like you are talking about STNG's holodeck when everyone else is talking about a comatose person with wires stuck in his brain.



 

Galabab

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

One thing to remember, Galabab and Johnny, is that if we are in a computer simulation, then the laws of our world need not apply to the world in which the computer exists. There maybe be no uncertainty principle or no Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Very good point. Thx.


 

Tanooki

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

I've heard our eyes have pretty dang low resolution. It's only by rapidly moving them and refocusing that the world seems HD. When you force yourself to stare at one spot, the world turns ugly fast.

If we assume about 24 frames per second (this is what movie projectors use, and we "see motion"), I could easily picture a world where areas are generated on the fly. Empty rooms, ect, wouldn't be rendered, and even spots where people are would be rendered poorly as the default and would be updated as our eyes move. Its our brains that generate the HD image we believe we're seeing.
 

buttershug

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

I've heard our eyes have pretty dang low resolution. It's only by rapidly moving them and refocusing that the world seems HD. When you force yourself to stare at one spot, the world turns ugly fast.

If we assume about 24 frames per second (this is what movie projectors use, and we "see motion"), I could easily picture a world where areas are generated on the fly. Empty rooms, ect, wouldn't be rendered, and even spots where people are would be rendered poorly as the default and would be updated as our eyes move. Its our brains that generate the HD image we believe we're seeing.
But our eyes would not be moving!!!

And in the BINAV scenario we wouldn't have eyes.



 

SnickerSnack

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

I think his point is that optical center of the brain is easily "fooled." You don't have to fully render an environment for the human mind to think it's real.

Another thing. Many posts talk about the huge amounts of data that must be rendered. For all I know, I'm the only real human and everything else is computer generated, so the people running the sim only need to render the things that I see. Many posts seem to assume a Matrix type scenario when it's possible that it's really a mix between the Matrix and the Truman Show.
 

Nazdakka

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

An entity capable of running a perfect simulation of the type being discussed is, to all intents and purposes, indistinguishable from God.
 

HegemonKhan

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

first, before we can respond to your question, "How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?", we need u to define what "real" is :D

The problem for "reality" (including things that make up "reality" like us-humans) is that no matter how much "reality" thinks that it knows it is 100% "reality", it doesn't and can never know if it truly is "reality" or not.

TRUTH is as aloof as is God. It might be even easier to discover God than it is to discover TRUTH.

everything we think we know and understand could be completely wrong. all of the accumulated scientific knowledge that humans have acquired over our history can ALWAYS be DISproven by scientific knowledge, and thats not even adressing things we can't comprehend like faith or even things that we aren't even aware of...something beyond science or faith

our entire structure at how we understand and makes sense of this already fabricated structure we call "life" or "existance" or "reality".

we than understand this "life" or "existance" or "reality" in terms of "time" as either linier (beginning and ending) or (circular-continous). this very structuring of this concept "time" may not be "real"

our whole understanding of light and time and space and gravity and dimensions ....string thoery ... could all be merely an imaginative fancy of our minds and something else entirely out of our conprehension is how things really "are".

we don't even know why a table is hard when it is made of atoms that are 99% empty space. and thats assuming we are right about their being atoms (quantum theory)

technically we could all be "gods" or "thoughts of awareness and conciousness" and each one of us creates or pretends to be a human with a physical body and a "world" or "universe/multiverse" surrounding us. and everything that we think is real isnt real. only these "waves of thought of awareness or conciousness" which is actually what we actually are and not beings with physical bodies.

there's so much potential in the unknown. in the unknown anything or nothing could be possible. unfortunately the TRUTH will always be unknown to us, no matter how much things seem to make sense and be right to us.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
what is real to us, is what we make or want to be real to us.

if i wanna be a king, i can be a king. if i wanna be the richest man in the world i can be the richest man in the world. the power of the human mind. we can make the world however we want it to be. if the world's reality isn't to your liking, make your own reality with your mind. become "dilusional" believe what u wanna believe and it WILL be real to u. the human mind can do anything for u that u want it to do. the human mind is "godly".

is the WOW or D2 video game that your walking around in or online any less real than if u get up from your chair and walk around ?

what makes walking around in "one world" (the "real" world) any different than walking around with your lvl 90 paladin in diablo 2 or your ogre-magi in WOW or whatever in "another world" (the "virtual or online" world) ??

there's actually no difference to your human mind.

in fact,

u don't see. your eyes are merely holes to the back on your brain. u can't see with holes! yet we "see", how? our brain takes the light pattern that enters our eye holes and goes to back of brain and imagines up the thing we think we are "seeing" and projects it out in front of us (much like a movie camera does when we watch a movie) and we think we are "seeing" it.

there's NO SUCH thing as pain or feeling (stimulus or stimuli whatever). our brain takes the pattern of energy-wave and creates what we think is "pain" or emotions or texture like softness or roughness. there's no such thing as pain or emotion or touch like texture like softness or roughness or etc...its all fake. our brain imagines it and then pretends its real and there.

hmm, real life doesn't seem as real as it did.... WOW or D2 now doesn't seem that much less real then the real world.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
i know a lot of science stuff, if any of u are interested in discussing science, let me know. but this thread's topic is fun, exploring the unknown :D

i'm fully capable of being serious and talking about actual science that we understand to make the world or our exitance or our universe/multiverse work

blackholes
string theory
quantum theory
quantum mechanics
time dilation effect
E=MC^2
space-time
electro-magnitism
micro physics: E-M force vs weak puny gravity force
radioactive decay
big bang and inflation
warping of space
gravity
time travel
fractals
cosmic eons (stages of the universe)
universe death vs immortality (if black holes "devour" all data-light or if they preserve it forever)
multiverses: "bubbles" of universe's or whatever
macro blackholes
micro black holes in the super collider (actual warping of space and time travel at the micro level)

.....i know many other fields of science too, not just micro and macro physics..
 
Last edited:

s4nder

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

An interesting post, though it would have had more impact with proper spelling :p.

Another intriguing theory is determinism. Since everything is made of particles and their interactions can be predicted based on their speed and position, if we had that information about every particle in the universe, it would theoretically be possible to predict future completely accurately forever.

However, the problem is that for small particles like electrons it's only possible to determine their position or velocity at any given moment in time and thus it's impossible to predict their exact behavior.

Still, to think that when it comes down to it, everything is happening as it's meant to happen since no other way is possible according to laws of physics is quite mind boggling. After all, as I'm typing this, electrical signals and chemical reactions are taking place in my brain and finger muscles, and all those reactions obey the laws of physics. Everything has a cause, things don't just happen.

This is not my own idea of course but the theory once came up in physics class and it seems quite plausible.
 
Last edited:

krischan

Europe Trade Moderator
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

In the quantum world, things can actually happen without a cause.
 

BobCox2

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

So the light speed limitation is the BUS speed of the computer that calculates the movement of everything in the Universe?
 

HegemonKhan

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

sorry about the spelling, i'm an american and due to online, i've become very lazy with the english language and misspell and use awful grammer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the quantum world, things can actually happen without a cause.
could u expound on this or give examples ?

i'm not a quantum physics mathematician or professor, and i am horrible at math, but i understand the concepts very well, so u can talk about advanced things, but leave the math out :D

i'm interested in this statement as it is first time i heard it and can't think of anything off-hand in quantum (particle) mechanics
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
this probably belongs more in the off topic thread, of do u believe in a god or not, but it can also apply here to the "matrix" concept:

within our own body (and all life) at the cellular lvl and maybe (some time in the future we'll find the same thing at the atomic level as fractals show us seems to hold true), that there are literally bulldozer or robot-machine cells. for example, if anyone knows about weightlifting or kinotheology, when u do anything (like physical resistance: weightlifting, running, or punching rigid structures like ice or bamboo trees), your causing (hopefully only) microscopic tears in your bones and muscles. yet, we get stronger...how is this possible? well, when we for example weight lift and cause microscopic tears in our bone and muscle, guess what happens when we rest. our body sends in its machine cells of bullbozers and whatever. they scrape or bulldoze away the damaged and torn muscle and bone, and than replace it with new muscle and bone. alright, i still haven't explained how u get stronger with bigger muscle and bone mass. well when your machine robot repair cells go to work, they don't just repair the damage done, they actually workover time and put on an extra layer of bone or muscle than was originally there before your torn it through physical activity. repeat the process and u get more and more layers of muscle and bone. your small biceps and other muscles get bigger and bigger. your knuckles or bones on you hand or feet-legs get bigger and bigger as u punch ice or bamboo trees or kick bamboo trees as u "bend it back and forth", use it. BOTH inorganic (like metal) and organic material (cells) suffers fatigue (like metal fatigue with airplanes or any metal structure and fatigue of a human when they do physical activity u get tired and worn out just like the metal in an airplane gets tired and worn out with activity and use). the difference is that organic material has a society already built into it by nature or a god or whatever with robots and machines to come and repair the damage. within metal itself there is no such society of robot and machines to repair the damage. now humans can make robots and machines to repair other machines and robots and metal (recycling, melting down damaged metal and repairing-making a new sheet of metal). i'm also sure that humans are trying to find a way to put into metal itself the same society of robots and machines that would allow the metal to repair itself jsut as the human body can, but this science-technology is still in its infancy. i think the closest we have right now is the memory metal.

in short organic material is really amazing. where inorganic material gets weaker with use and time (take a metal paperclip and bend it back and forth, what happens? it snaps. the metal snaps and breaks), organic material (like bone, muscle, and the brain) gets bigger and stronger, not weaker.

but i'm getting side-tracked here, back to the point of all this:

fractals show us the ingenious-ness of nature. u take a simple pattern and repeat it to create complex structures. take a forest, thats really complex and its impossible to understand how it came to be arranged the way it is right? WRONG. look at a single tree's structure, shape, dimensions, proportionality, placement and than look at an entire forest and guess what the forest is simple many that individual tree metrics repeated over and over again. the distance between branches on the individual tree is the same as the distance between trees in a forest. this is a pretty recent discovery and has enormous application and use.

a single blue print of dna gives us the simpliest life like bacteria, repeat that blueprint over and over and u get humans.

a take a tree and repeat that tree over and over and u have the layout of an entire forest. another way to visualize it is this: take a tree and lay it on the ground. guess what? you'll find trees rising out of the ground at the exact same vertexies as your imaginary tree shape laying on the ground.

u take humans using machines and robots to do stuff like build cars and at the same time we find at the cellular level within our body "something" is using the same method of machines and robots to repair our body.

a simple pattern or system or struture used by itself to create simple things or repeated over and voer to create complex things.

this is the fractal concept. it be stupid to try to make a complex human. its much easier and more efficient to use the same simple pattern for a simple life form and repeat it over and over to make a complex human. why try to re-invent life. just take your most basic life and repeat over and over and magically u now have organs repeat it again and u got organ systems repeat again and u got an organism...etc...

in fact, your cell phones and black berrys and any gps communication system is possible thanks to fractals.

within every cell phone is a micro-antena, but the secret was to take a normal straight antena and to bend it over and over into a small structure. this increases the surface area of the antenna and makes it more powerful and gave us our cell phones.

which gets us into the clock theory:

does the clock exist (is there really complex things in this world that we will never understand) or is the clock merely a system or pattern of gears that gives us the illusion of a magical "clock". are humans magically unique or are we simply a bunch of "gears" in a system or pattern that gives the illusion of the human organism or being ?

fractals seems to finally ended the clock theory debate by proving how simple patterns ("gears") when repeated over and over, gives rise to what we see as complex things ("clocks") and shows us how that is possible and real, even though there's really no such thing as a magically "clock" or a "human being or awareness-consciousness-mind-thought"

yet, what or "who" made this discovery that seems to give us our entire universe and used it, long before humans came into existance and plagerized this system which allowed us to create our machines and robots and computers, even though the unierse already had its own machines and robots and computers first. "who" or what came up with the concept and application of simple patterns repeated over and over again to give us more and more complex structures that we are discovering more and more prominent in the universe.

take for example "star dust" (elements like simple hydrogen) and through fusion add another proton and u get hellium. add more protons through more fusion and energy and u get heavier elements which than causes a super nova sending out the heavier elements into space. gravity pulls the heavier elements together into "clouds" (nebulas) or into meteors or comets or even planets. in nebulas new stars are born repeating the process. than one of those planets will come to be named earth by the human life that arises on it. the same star dust that made stars, made planets, and even made humans. we (stars, planets, humans, life) are all simply stardust.

and this is possible all because of fractals. take a simple pattern, the atom with a single proton (hydrogen) and innitually through fusion u add protons (or atoms teogether) giving rise to complex heavier and heavier elements. these heavier and heavier elements come together to make planets and even life on one of those planets (earth).

its fascinating how the simple pattern of the atom-proton being repeated over and over (fusion-bonded together, adding protons or joining atoms) gives us both simple helium, complex uranium, and even complex DNA, brains, and entire human beings.

thats the fractal concept. humans and everything complex are the results of taking a simple pattern, system, or structure, or thing and repeating it over and over that seems to create the magically complex thing like a human or a forest or a cellphone or the organs or whatever in a body.

isn't it amusing that at the simplified level that the atomic struture is the exact same as the solar system's structure. yes, there's the atomic structure is much more complicated than your rings (solar system) but maybe the solar system is in orbitals too. with string theory and multiple dimensions and warping of space or the connection of space and hyper space etc...

to wrap it all up, the universe/multiverse is one giant matrix. but is it being controlled by something or someone or is it simply a result of fractals of a simple pattern repeated over and over again to give us the illusion of an entire universe/multiverse ???


 
Last edited:

SnickerSnack

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

An entity capable of running a perfect simulation of the type being discussed is, to all intents and purposes, indistinguishable from God.
Pretty much.

But, the interesting question is, what if there is also a "genuine" god? Will the "real" god trump the actions of the sim-running entity? Or maybe, there is simply another sim that our sim-runners are in.

Layer 2 sim runners
..........Layer 1 sim runners
..................us

In this case who really has power over our world?

we don't even know why a table is hard when it is made of atoms that are 99% empty space. and thats assuming we are right about their being atoms (quantum theory)
We refer to the basic forces of repulsion to explain that. I don't remember which one it is. (the electric force maybe?)

An interesting post, though it would have had more impact with proper spelling :p.
Are you joking? Can you point out ten misspellings? It should be easy if there are so many that it interferes with basic communication.


 
Last edited:

Glurin

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

Pretty much.

But, the interesting question is, what if there is also a "genuine" god? Will the "real" god trump the actions of the sim-running entity? Or maybe, there is simply another sim that our sim-runners are in.

Layer 2 sim runners
..........Layer 1 sim runners
..................us

In this case who really has power over our world?
Somebody made a crappy movie out of that idea also. People in a sim creating a sim. Don't remember much about it other than the overall idea though. I just remember that it was a terrible movie.

Anyway, if we expand on the idea a little, wouldn't this situation essentially be like making a copy of a copy? Eventually you'll hit a point where any sim that is created would be so unstable that you can't go any further. Even if they theoretically created a better sim than the current one, it would have to run on and be controlled by the current sims technology. This would impose that technology's limits on any sim that it runs. Kind of like how you can't run certain games smoothly on max settings because you have a low end video card or something.
 

HegemonKhan

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: How do we know life is real? Is a Matrix theory possible?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HegemonKhan
we don't even know why a table is hard when it is made of atoms that are 99% empty space. and thats assuming we are right about their being atoms (quantum theory)

We refer to the basic forces of repulsion to explain that. I don't remember which one it is. (the electric force maybe?). -snickersnack
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
err, not the best example, you're probably right, that the E-M force (u said u didnt know which force it is, it is the E-M force) explains this.

i should have said it this way instead:

the E-M force explains how the table can be and is solid ("hard") despite that it's made up of atoms that are 99% empty space or nothing. but, it doesn't explain why or how we see the table, why don't we see the 99% empty space that it is made of, why do we see a table when there is no table, it's just empty space. how is there a visable table from empty space?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
explanation of how the E-M force makes the table solid ("hard"):

background info:

big bang:

1 super force originally. it than for some reason, broke into the 4 forces and through inflation was exploded out...giving us what we understand as the universe.

the 4 forces that we are so familiar with (at least those who know-interested in science or science career-job-classes):

strong force (nuclear force. it holds the protons and neutrons together making the necleus possible. it's this force's bonds that are broken and re-connected that gives us nuclear energy either for a plant or a weapon-bomb).

(well the neutrons might be held together by the gluons? rahter than by the strong force but that's getting into too much detail. i can't remember if gluons is right or not if that what the gluons do, holding the neutrons together or something else. gluons, mesons, neutrinos, and etc are teh other sub-atomic particles. protons, neutrons, and electrons aren't the only sub atomic particles)

weak force (radioactive decay. the "destroyer" force. breaks down uranium into lead. it's like the backward force of sun-solar fusion, undoing what stars-suns do with fusion)

gravity force: (pull or inward or attraction force. the puny-iest and weakest force but at the macro scale it is the force that controls the universe and all macro physics like black holes, the red shift, big bang, universe, stars, falling on your rear lol, etc etc.

E-M force (electro-magnitism force. "opposites attract". "+" charge and "-" charge attraction and "maybe" male and female attraction. explains static electricity when u shock people even still as an adult *grins* i can't grow out of it! and why your hair stands up or why water coming out your sink facet will bend to your charged hair comb and etc..)

(scientists are so imaginity EXCEPT with names! electricity and magnitism are the SAME thing, and creatively (sarcasm) scientists have named this now old discovery electro-magnitism. its the same lack of creativity with space-time and matter-energy. einstein with his E=MC^2 showed us that matter and energy are the same thing and with his time dilation showed us that space and time are the same thing, space-time, so creative (sarcasm).

anyways finaly about E-M: it is also what keeps electrons whizzing around the nucleus of an atom

and long last:

it's theorized that the POWERFUL E-M force that creates a "magical" bond between the nucleus and the electrons whizzing around, is what keeps a person or car or meteor "falling" from a cliff or building or space due to puny weak force of gravity, from "falling" right through the entire earth or ground and out the otehr side of the planet earth.

this theory also explains why the table is solid ("hard") despite being made up of 99% empty space or nothing.

gravity is very very weak compared to the 3 other forces, but people get confused because they only see gravity on a massive scale and understandably think it is a powerful force when it really isnt. i don't wanna imagine the other 3 forces at the same scale as gravity is, in fact, the universe/existance would NOT be possible if the 3 other forces reached the same scale as gravity can and is at.
 
Last edited:
Top