Amongst other things. MixedVariety or one of the other mods banned him a while ago for posting too many racy pix.Wasn't Jennifer Walcott a Playmate? :scratchchin:
I know that in the civilised world it's unpopular, of course America may be a different story.And I was saying that in my experience, it isn't. I was hoping you'd provide me with some reason to take your opinion on the matter, rather than just restating said opinion.
What you mean is, a 1.75 trillion deficit (minus the existing deficit) fighting a massive global financial crisis (not optional) versus fighting two unnecessary wars that accomplished nothing (optional).So you think building an 800 billion deficit in 8 years while fighting two wars should be more alarming than building a 1.75 trillion deficit in 3 months while pulling out?
Oh snap.I know that in the civilised world it's unpopular, of course America may be a different story.
Yeah, we should have totally followed the example of all you inferior nations. We should start off by slashing our standard of living by at least a third, and abandoning all our innovations of the last 25 years. That would put us right at your level.What you should've done is gotten your deficit under control when you had the chance - in fact Bush inherited a massive surplus from Clinton, the first since the 60s, which he completely pissed away - so you'd be prepared to go into deficit to deal with a real crisis, which you have to do.
Fixed for ya. Even with your cultural wellness factors and such bull**** we still always win.Everyone in the world would have to raise their standard of living to beat parts of the US.
Howdy, Moo. How's law school?The OTF seems as lively as ever. Garbad, it's been ages.
This administration's spending spree is based on Mickey Mouse Keynesian economics (animal spirits, too much saving, blah blah blah). But we can agree to disagree about what the right economic approach might be.
But... but, TEH NOBEL PRYZE!! (can't believe I'm citing Rockwell)Keynesian economics just fails. TBH I was shocked to see reputable economists still claim it works. I studied the **** as an undergrad and I can't remember any economist actually buying into it.
Krugman is an economist in the same way Ann Coulter is a lawyer. Would you trust her jurisprudence on *** rights?But... but, TEH NOBEL PRYZE!! (can't believe I'm citing Rockwell)
I'm the wrong person to ask - given our nature v. nurture discussion you can probably infer my attitude about homos. I usually use the "f-word" but was recently harangued for political insensitivity; who knew? I also considered the term "wetback" to not be a racial stereotype, but rather an indicator of illegal alien status.Krugman is an economist in the same way Ann Coulter is a lawyer. Would you trust her jurisprudence on *** rights?
Heh, you mean the part containing the 1% of your population that controls 40% of your nation's wealth?Fixed for ya. Even with your cultural wellness factors and such bull**** we still always win.
LAWLZKeynesian economics just fails. TBH I was shocked to see reputable economists still claim it works. I studied the **** as an undergrad and I can't remember any economist actually buying into it.
I stand by this statement.I also think Obama doesn't know how to stop campaigning.
Not to distract you from your duel, but do you see a large rich/poor divide as inherently negative?Heh, you mean the part containing the 1% of your population that controls 40% of your nation's wealth?
Really? That's not the conclusion I came to after discovering the architect of the AIG bailout.After Obama approves all the earmarks in the budget, and then whines about AIG bonuses, I have come to the conclusion that he is penny wise, pound foolish.
Did you forget these: [sarcasm][/sarcasm]? Or have you really never heard of the Spectator?Jmerv, you read the most crackpot political sites I can imagine. Where do you find this ****?
Fox Business said:While the Senate was constructing the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. That amendment provides an “exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009” -- which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are now seeking to tax.