Vajar said:
With 40 in dex, without demon limb, 6x sharp GCs (best option for all physical melee) raven frost and a ring with 125 AR, the chance to hit with angelics is around 5% more than without. Given an average hit rate of 80-85% (with angelics), that means you're hitting around 6% more (85/50 and 80/75). ....
When you add in a demon limb enchant, the difference is much less because of diminishing returns.
my Polearm wwinder:
With BK/raven & ~200 ar from charms my final ar is:
Without DL enchant: 4408
With DL enchant: 6390.
When swapping to angelics/bk with all else remaining the same .
Without DL enchant:7672
With DL enchant:11219
A difference of 3264 final ar without demonlimb & 4829 after dl.The diference in cth isnt 5% more,its more like 15 to 20% cth depending on the target.The difference isnt 'less' when you add demonlimb,its clearly greater & please explain 'diminishing returns' on ar calculations.
vajar said:
Not enough to sacrifice 1.33% dmg (approx. Highlords), +1 Skill, and the benefits that Steelrends provides.
I am not offering anything 'new',but I believe you should know:33% deadly from highlords doesnt mean 1.33% more damage(also..p.s: its not percentage its *1.33 or 33% even if its wrong). Critical is checked first & if it fails deadly is checked & they exlude each other when they are checked individually.
Final chance of double damage=CS + (DS/100)*(100-CS)
So with 22% critical,15% deadly from gores,highlords only offers a 26% more chance of double damage(*1.26) not the listed deadly of 33%.Instead of 33% or *1.33(22 cs,15 ds) the multiplier is 59% or *1.59.
vajar said:
This is what mana potions are for, they drop all the time, enough to make up for unleechables (except maybe a two places in act 2, tombs and sewers). If you argue about mana burn monsters, DTM won't fix those problems.
True,but dtm is a much better supplement to ml & it really is a matter of playstyle/strategy,I dont like carrying/drinking blues all the time,if there is a mod in the game that can help in tight spaces then why not?.When soloing,in larger games you need more whirls to finish off monsters,so you must drink quite frequently to be able to use ww on unleechables,most shift to conc but DTM is the fastest way around & it helps a lot in pits.
vajar said:
Considering good equipment, in PvM, inventory is best utilized for damage - resists are easy to obtain elsewhere.
Not for non shields users.Max resist are obtained with gear like arreats/coh/anni.Arreats is pretty much standard isue but coh & anni are pricy.Actually life from inventory is a good bet as well,Titans?
vajar said:
Nothing that interesting or impressive. Basically contains everything you've said here, but with a lot of statistics thrown in. Also kinda convinces me that this won't end anywhere, and you'll keep going for the last word (fanatic, I believe someone mentioned), so I'm not gonna continue the discussion beyond this post. I think we've said what we've needed to say.
I wasnt asking for an appreciation I've had a fair share of that & criticism as well,I have numbers/stats/tests to back up my claims,if defending my views based on that makes me a fanatic,I am least bothered.& I am not forcing you to,I am not enjoying this either.
vajar said:
Well, first of all, there are two arguments here. The angelics one is well overblown and I've stated my opinions on it above. The second one is what you are referring to. Of course, I shifted the focus of a comparison between BK ring and Steelrends. Thats where the attention should be focused. You're recommending souldrainers, highlords and bulkathos. I'm recommending steelrends, a dual leech ring and highlords. Dual leech ring = Souldrainers. Highlords = Highlords. So the only two items left to compare are Bul Kathos and Steelrends..
I am recommending Soul drainers highlord bulkathos?.Saying this for the 2nd time:My advice:His weapon is botd(dual leech),so I did say Steels.Botd is defense cut:highlords/raven/bk.Both bk & raven are better than a dual leech ring.Botd gives all the leech you need.Bk gives +1 skill:more ar/dmg/defense/life & ll.Raven gives 20 dex,cbf & ~250 ar.Much better choices than the avg/possible stats of a dl ring for a botd.Are you arguing against this?
"dual leech ring=souls.Highlords = Highlords": I believe you said earlier that a dl ring is better than souls,I cant make much of the second one.
vajar said:
No need to attack here. Steelrends are the best choice beyond botd weapons, they're a better choice for a much larger swath of weapons. I'm just pointing out that he's not asking for an easy and cheap solution. He's asking for the best solution and I really don't believe that your suggestions give him that - they may be good suggestions, but certainly not the best (although angelics for PvM is a poor suggestion IMO, unless you're just looking for cheap/untwinked)...
good or poor? & IMO? I have provided backing on why angelics is not a 'poor' suggestion for pvm atleast.Actually,for base dex wwinder builds like titans/IK or vita polearmers angelics is really a good choice,if not the best & if you hang around here long enough,you'd notice I am not the only one who uses & recommends them,for base dex/non defense cut/itd weapons.'IMO' wont cut anything,when you rate others advice.I have a logical explanation: Since ar is less important with defensecut/itd,highlords is clearly a better choice. But for other weapons ar is needed at high levels 7k minmum in hell to hit often enough, plus I have backing for that in tests/calcs/stats etc.
vajar said:
I never said this was guaranteed. Like I said, its a bell and whistle of using a dual leech ring, its not the selling point. The selling point is freeing up the glove spot for Steelrends (and the benefits of it over BK).
If he can get a dual leech ring in the bk slot,then yes obviously souls must be replaced with steels,since dl is the only reason one uses souls, & bk should go.Are you arguing for this? The logic is simple:Steels are better than souls but what about ml? so dl replaces bk to replace souls with steels.Thats obvious as hell.How does that become steels vs bk argument? & beleive me I am not arguing with you on that.
vajar said:
The first time the word 'dual angelics' appeared was when you said it. I said angelics is a bad choice for PvM, which was in reply to your suggestion of angelics + bkring. Since it was a reply to your suggestion, it was implied I meant a single angelic ring. Implications can be tricky things, so I'll let it slide..
You said "that is a really poor advice for pvm" meaning everything I said in that post was crap.I am just defending my views & with proof.Actually I am amazed at you statments about angelics being a bad/poor choice for pvm. My view: Depends on weapon. Both setups have been tried & tested & not just by me, some are of the view that wrath is slightly better, some say angelics is for (for titans & ik),I am of the view the choice depends on weapon. You can check the guide stikeys of ww & ik. Guides here are heavily scrutinized before they are added so you can be absolutely certain they dont contain poor advice.
vajar said:
Obviously. I never suggested using battlecry on everything that moves. Just monsters where it'd make a huge difference, angelics or not - monsters with large defense and multi-whirl battles such as Lister and Bosses...
Indeed,thats why I said it,you arent killing bosses & lister all the time.Normal & more numerous Monsters like frenzy minos,death beetles & many others have very high defense ratings as well.2k+ & some like the bone scarab have higher defense than Lister minions:2.4k.Even with 7k ar your cth is 75%.
vajar said:
I'm arguing against your first suggestion. The second suggestion, I've argued plenty enough about in the first part of this post. Again, I've gone over this above.
His weapon is botd.So according to my first post:I am saying steels & wrath/raven/bk.Are you arguing against this?.If the second suggestion is angelics,yes you have argued enough but never really convinced me on why angelics is a poor choice for pvm.
vajar said:
Nuff said, the discussion is over, unless you have anything new to offer.
I can imagine why you are saying that.
I have put a lot of time & effort in the forum with tests/stats & discussions with fellow forumers etc.. to come to conclusions about advices I give here & unlike you it is not my opinion that drives me, I have factual backing for that, so I wont appreciate careless remarks being aimed at me.
Razgriz