I have a friend that's been thown into this sort of mess. He was setup by some guys that don't like him and called police saying they saw child porn on his computer. Of course they confiscated the computer, found the pictures and arrested him. He was 17 at the time. Two years later, they find him guilty of four counts of possesion of child pornography (out of eight in the beginning) and spent 30 days in jail. He was required to register as a pedophile/child molester even though he had never done such things.I've been in the odd position where I've been friends with a pedophile for a while. (No longer though and it's been years ago)
Children, ages six to eight or so.Could you define child porn in this context? Was it teenagers or actual children? I think it makes a vital difference in defining what he is/is not.
His roommates at the time after they got into some sort of huge fight over something that was probably very stupid.As far as I can understand it correctly, the guys that framed him somehow put those pics on his computer.
No. No way do I even come close to agreeing with the above quote.In my opinion, pedophilia, however despicable, is something people can be a victim of. It's like a disease: you can't help getting it.
Ok, that makes a little more sense.I specifically said "like a disease", toader, with which I only wanted to say that getting these urges is beyond your own control. Of course no sexual orientation is actually a disease.
See, I guess I differentiate there.Whether it's upbringing/past experiences or factors encoded into them, it's still beyond their control.
The victims of pedophiles who keep their urges in check?Personally I'm more in interested in what's done to help the victims.
It is not surprising that you want to shoot or hang someone for what they think.Me and Saro can't disagree more on this. I'll keep it short.
Hang them or shoot them or whatever you want to do. Just kill them. And anybody that supports them as well.
Good point.See, I guess I differentiate there.
You can change stuff that was a product of your upbringing. Whether it be by talking with counselors, having a different experience over time, or just by being in a different environment, etc, etc.
But, something hard coded...such as DNA perhaps. That is unchangeable.
I do see what you mean by both being beyond their control. I just think in one situation one can TAKE control, where in the other, one cannot.
No I mean the ones who are victims of ones who don't keep their urges in check. I hope I dont get an arguement when I say they deserve compassion.The victims of pedophiles who keep their urges in check?
While disease doesn't seem quite right, what would you call it? derangment? disability? There's really no good term. All of these imply that we need a cure, a fix, a way to rectify a wrong. At the same time, it's hard for me to say it's merely a preference. Perhaps a fetish? I think that's as close as I can get.Sorry I wasn't too clear then, although I did say "like". On the other hand, I would have expected you know me long enough to know I definately don't consider homosexuality a disease. :smiley:
Whether it's upbringing/past experiences or factors encoded into them, it's still beyond their control.
In reference to "Not prison" are you talking about people who just have the urge? Or people who have acted on the urge?Not prison