Are *** men better singers?

Amra

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

If you want your male children to turn out hetersexual, then make sure YOU do all the stressful work for the mother to ensure she has a stress-free pregnancy.
Funniest thing I've heard in ages. :thankyou:



 

Tanooki

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

If you read my post, I mentioned Africa skewing the numbers. That suggests that I don't believe they're all homosexual.

Minus Africa, is heterosexual sex still the leading cause of AIDS transmission?

Africa isn't exactly a 1st world country. Until all other factors can be ruled out (like coming in contact with contaminated blood, violent rape (there has to be at the least microtearing for the virus to get into the blood stream, which is why sex isn't 100% transmitting) and any number of factors, I'm not going to believe the idea that someone living in Africa wouldn't have caught AIDS had they just avoided consentual heterosexual contact.

So outside of 3rd world countries, is heterosexual sex still the leading cause of AIDS? Because it isn't in America.
 

krischan

Europe Trade Moderator
Re: Are *** men better singers?

If you leave out the parts of the numbers which aren't to your liking, you can produce any result you like. Perhaps the US is skewing the numbers ? According to the link I provided, the US has a higher AIDS rate than most of Europe :scratchchin:

As said, the reason for homosexuals being represented to a greater extent than others is that they often have more fluctuation with their relationships. That's not because they are homosexual, but because they are men. Heterosexual men just cannot get away that easily with that stone age attitude. The willingness of their female partners to switch relations as often as their underwear is typically a bit lower. If that's the explanation, the consequence shouldn't be condemning homosexuality, but demanding more discipline with respect to AIDS prevention, just as with (Pandora box !) weapons.

Back to the topic this evolved from, whether homosexuals should be tolerated, my personal opinion is yes (which is already OT with respect to the original point of this thread). You might not accept that for yourself, but that doesn't mean that you can enforce your own opinion onto others, else you will have to move to a country where there are no homosexuals by decree, e.g. Iran :whistling:

If I exposed myself to a greater AIDS risk, that would be my personal decision (note the conjunctive ;)). I don't think that it's allowed in for adults to have sex with underaged people, no matter if homosexual or not, but when grown up men are among themselves, they are free to decide about their sexual habits, contract any disease they like, jump off a cliff or whatever, as long as they don't enforce it on others.
 

Stoutwood

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

(there has to be at the least microtearing for the virus to get into the blood stream, which is why sex isn't 100% transmitting)
No, it just has to come in contact with a semi-permeable mucous membrane. The reason sex isn't 100% transmitting is because nothing is. However, another big reason is because men in heterosexual sex have a much lower risk of contracting any sexually transmitted disease because of the way the penis is built. Women stand a much higher rate because all of that stuff is shot into them where it awaits cleanup by the body (moving it into the, guess what - bloodstream). In addition to that, the "microtearing" that you mentioned happens quite often during regular sex. This is because friction causes wear and nothing is a perfect lubricant.



 

Tanooki

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

I can like a *** person without liking the *** culture. I thought I made that distinction clear.
 

Tanooki

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

You're right. Not sure if there's a word for "3rd world continent", though.

Not that many people, outside of Africa, eat monkeys. So it wouldn't have spread.
 

Dirty_Zulu

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

Well folks tonight is the 3rd group of singers. I'll be counting how many guys are potentially ***. I know the drama queen with the nose ring is definitely ***.
 

Dondrei

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

I thought everyone on Idol was ***, but it turned out they were Christians. It must attract choir kids.

P.S. Tanooki, I dare you to go have sex with an HIV positive woman.

You seriously make the worst threads. Terrible, simply awful.
I know, I always open up his threads, for the same reason I watch Uwe Boll movies.

I believe everyone is "predispositioned" for different things. (For example, kelptomaniacs, nymphomaniacs, pyromaniacs, ect.) I don't, however, believe this gives them an excuse to participate in whatever they want just because they "feel" like doing it.
I demand that you find men attractive.

As far as not hurting anyone else, tell me how exactly AIDS would have spread without the *** community?
Man, there must be a hell of a lot of gays in Africa.

I'm reminded of Romans 1:24-27, particularly the last line. Notice it was written a good 2,000 years before AIDS was discovered.
So if I say that bad things will happen to Christians and 2,000 years from now a disease ravages the Christian community, I'm a prophet?

AIDS is most easily transmitted through *** sex - less so through hetero-sex. AIDS has spread through needle use, blood transfusions and *** sex - almost exclusively. There are exceptions, but there have been very few substantiated cases of transmitting to someone through 100% straight sex. (i.e. sharing a needle and having sex doesn't count.) *edit* I forgot birth - that's one way to pass the disease.
Boy are you deluded.

P.S. AIDS is most easily passed sexually by, in order:

*** male sex
Straight sex
Lesbian sex

So by your logic God wants all women to be lesbians.

And I would be willing to bet money that Tanooki is born-again.
I think he's just old.



 

Tanooki

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

If only everyone else had made the same decisions I had, AIDS wouldn't be spreading like it is.

But apparently it's "unrealistic" for me to believe other people have even half the self control I do.

"Kids are going to have sex anyway, because they're just animals under the control of the whims of their bodies, so let's help them pretend they're being responsible."

"People are going to do drugs anyway, because they're just animals under the control of their feeble minds, so let's help them pretend they're being responsible."

I refuse to believe I've got some sort of superior mind over body control, but somehow I resisted the urge to do drugs or have sex outside of marriage. So either everyone else is inferior to me, or they just don't want to bother trying. Which is less insulting?
 

lAmebAdger

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

stop saying words like "everyone" or phrase fragments like "everyone else" and people might actually warm up to your opinions...
 

Tanooki

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

Ok, all those kids out there having premarital sex (and people having affairs) plus people who do drugs. I've just been educated by the left that includes about 95% of the US population.
 

Johnny

Banned
Re: Are *** men better singers?

Assuming the kids practise safe sex then there's nothing wrong at all with what they're doing.

Meanwhile why are we getting off track here. Wasn't it the evil sodomites that spread aids?
 

Garbad_the_Weak

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

Assuming the kids practise safe sex then there's nothing wrong at all with what they're doing.

Meanwhile why are we getting off track here. Wasn't it the evil sodomites that spread aids?
TBH we should just put contraceptives in the water and let people go nuts. If someone wanted a child, they could just submit proof of employment, pass a genetics test for serious diseases, and be given the antidote. Perfect solution, right?



 

Tanooki

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

Perhaps we should quarantine people with incurable STDs.. or tattoo them so they can't knowingly spread it.
 

Johnny

Banned
Re: Are *** men better singers?

TBH we should just put contraceptives in the water and let people go nuts. If someone wanted a child, they could just submit proof of employment, pass a genetics test for serious diseases, and be given the antidote. Perfect solution, right?
Did you quote me by accident? because this post has nothing to do with what I posted.

Perhaps we should quarantine people with incurable STDs.. or tattoo them so they can't knowingly spread it.
The sad part is that you're not even being sarcastic.



 

Yaboosh

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

P.S. AIDS is most easily passed sexually by, in order:

*** male sex
Straight sex
Lesbian sex

So by your logic God wants all women to be lesbians.



I think he's just old.

Apparently licking buttholes is a good way to contract AIDS as well.



 

lAmebAdger

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

apparently getting injected with AIDS infected needles wielded by desperate people driven nuts by their fate is also a "good" way

@Johnny: and i wouldn't call the AIDS thing on-topic at all...

here's a track that'll bring us back:

IMO there are enough great singers who are not *** out there. just seek them out and you will get the feeling that ***'s are not automatically better singers by default
 

Dondrei

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: Are *** men better singers?

If only everyone else had made the same decisions I had, AIDS wouldn't be spreading like it is.

But apparently it's "unrealistic" for me to believe other people have even half the self control I do.

"Kids are going to have sex anyway, because they're just animals under the control of the whims of their bodies, so let's help them pretend they're being responsible."

"People are going to do drugs anyway, because they're just animals under the control of their feeble minds, so let's help them pretend they're being responsible."

I refuse to believe I've got some sort of superior mind over body control, but somehow I resisted the urge to do drugs or have sex outside of marriage. So either everyone else is inferior to me, or they just don't want to bother trying. Which is less insulting?
No, it's just that you're really ugly.



 
Top