Re: Are *** men better singers?
If you leave out the parts of the numbers which aren't to your liking, you can produce any result you like. Perhaps the US is skewing the numbers ? According to the link I provided, the US has a higher AIDS rate than most of Europe :scratchchin:
As said, the reason for homosexuals being represented to a greater extent than others is that they often have more fluctuation with their relationships. That's not because they are homosexual, but because they are men. Heterosexual men just cannot get away that easily with that stone age attitude. The willingness of their female partners to switch relations as often as their underwear is typically a bit lower. If that's the explanation, the consequence shouldn't be condemning homosexuality, but demanding more discipline with respect to AIDS prevention, just as with (Pandora box !) weapons.
Back to the topic this evolved from, whether homosexuals should be tolerated, my personal opinion is yes (which is already OT with respect to the original point of this thread). You might not accept that for yourself, but that doesn't mean that you can enforce your own opinion onto others, else you will have to move to a country where there are no homosexuals by decree, e.g. Iran :whistling:
If I exposed myself to a greater AIDS risk, that would be my personal decision (note the conjunctive

). I don't think that it's allowed in for adults to have sex with underaged people, no matter if homosexual or not, but when grown up men are among themselves, they are free to decide about their sexual habits, contract any disease they like, jump off a cliff or whatever, as long as they don't enforce it on others.