Are *** men better singers?

[Dirty_Zulu]

Are *** men better singers?

What are the statistics for homosexual men in the general population?

Well what ever it is, if you base your assessment on American Idol or its auditions you would think 1/2 the men in US is ***.

I think on the show So You Think You Can Dance, most of the guys are ***. *** men are better singers and dancers?

The girls on American Idol are simply hot and straight.

 

[Garbad_the_Weak]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

You're obviously homophobic for suggesting there may be genetic differences based on sexual orientation. Besides, *** is a social construct; its not binary. Finally, *** people are simply products of their environment -- because they are less concerned about appearing masculine, they are more willing to involve themselves in traditionally effeminate activity, such as dancing, singing, and TV.

*Sorry, I'm just bitter. Please proceed.

 

[Amra]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

Well what ever it is, if you base your assessment on American Idol or its auditions you would think 1/2 the men in US is ***.

It IS American Idol. It's what it's known for.

 

[Ash Housewares]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

if you base your assessment on American Idol

you're doing it wrong

 

[Es Mors]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

You're obviously homophobic for suggesting there may be genetic differences based on sexual orientation. Besides, *** is a social construct; its not binary. Finally, *** people are simply products of their environment -- because they are less concerned about appearing masculine, they are more willing to involve themselves in traditionally effeminate activity, such as dancing, singing, and TV.

*Sorry, I'm just bitter. Please proceed.

I'd say your second point might be one of the reaons why we see a lot of *** people in artistic careers. Horowitz supposedly said that there are three types of pianists - *** pianitsts, jewish pianists and bad pianists. (Horowitz was both jewish and ***. And a pianist.)

And since when is *** a swearword? Why the hell is it censored? I'd say that is homophobic!

 

[Tanooki]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

Censoring is ... oh wait.


NSFW (and please don't bother clicking if you're easily offended, or aren't, but feel you should never have to be offended.)

Spoiler

I fail to see how taking it up the butt relates in any way shape or form to the vocal chords or diaphragm.

 

[lAmebAdger]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

You're obviously homophobic for suggesting there may be genetic differences based on sexual orientation. Besides, *** is a social construct; its not binary. Finally, *** people are simply products of their environment -- because they are less concerned about appearing masculine, they are more willing to involve themselves in traditionally effeminate activity, such as dancing, singing, and TV.

*Sorry, I'm just bitter. Please proceed.

remember nature vs. nurture? why can't genes be an influence on sexual orientation?

you're not thinking about what you yourself said in another thread...

 

[stillman]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

Tanooki,

Although your post is humorous, I have to point out that there is more to it than differences in sexual preference. The homosexual male brain is physically different than the normal male brain. Homosexuals' brains are demasculinized (or feminized) during neonatal development. The female default brain does not completely become masculinized due to certain hormonal factors.

Thus, a homosuexual male is slightly more preoccupied with feminine interests.

Being a fan of powerful macho 80's male AND female singers, I have noticed too the drastic changes in popular music types in recent times. Music lyrics and manner of singing is become a little to, idk, frail and weak. It sounds like you could touch the singers of today with your fingernail and they would fall apart and collapse on the floor in crying heap. I'm not sure if 'they're all homosexuals', but maybe they are simply pressured to sing a certain way to be in tune with the times.

Like, you know, whatever.

OP, I wouldn't be too sure about the girls being 'hot and straight.' I think you'd be amazed at the statistics regarding experimentation amoung young females.

To answer your question, idk what the stats are on homosexuals in the population, but I'm sure it's ever increasing due to a higher number of stressful pregnancies taking place. These days, women want to manage a career while they are pregnant, they want to keep the stressful lifestyle going while they are pregnant, and the stress hormones (being glucocorticoid steroids) pass through the neonate's tissues causing damage in sexually dimorphic nuclei.

Of course, I explained all this in more detail in another thread and some people thought I was some raving idiot, so I'll cut it short here. Homosexuality is caused by stress hormones secreted during a stressful pregnancy. There will always be homosexual males as long as there are women not taking care of themselves while pregnant.

If you want your male children to turn out hetersexual, then make sure YOU do all the stressful work for the mother to ensure she has a stress-free pregnancy.

 

[Voorhees]

Personally, I think that people in the arts just seem to be more open minded about things in general, and therefor would logically contain more instances of social taboos than other demographics might. Why would you live, work, and play with people who hate you when you can do all these things in other groups of people who are largely more accepting of you and may even be like you.
That said, if you base your assessment of ANYTHING on American Idol, you are going to have a grossly warped perspective.

 

[Yaboosh]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

You seriously make the worst threads. Terrible, simply awful.

 

[Johnny]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

You're obviously homophobic for suggesting there may be genetic differences based on sexual orientation. Besides, *** is a social construct; its not binary. Finally, *** people are simply products of their environment -- because they are less concerned about appearing masculine, they are more willing to involve themselves in traditionally effeminate activity, such as dancing, singing, and TV.

*Sorry, I'm just bitter. Please proceed.

Homosexuality is not genetic per default but can be caused for genetic reasons. For example people that have double sets of chromosomes are many times more likely to become homosexual than people who have a regular set.

 

[Es Mors]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

Homosexuality is caused by stress hormones secreted during a stressful pregnancy. There will always be homosexual males as long as there are women not taking care of themselves while pregnant.

Source? :scratchchin:

 

[krischan]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

Wow, what an interesting way to blame women for it :smug:

Even if it's true, being stressed is a matter of the environment, so perhaps the people around the woman should take more care about not stressing her.

"OMG, you didn't sit down on the toilet again ! Now our child will become a homosexual !"

 

[Stoutwood]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

I think the biggest tragedy in the fight for *** rights is the fact that they have to make it sound like an incurable condition to be accepted.

 

[Tanooki]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

I believe everyone is "predispositioned" for different things. (For example, kelptomaniacs, nymphomaniacs, pyromaniacs, ect.) I don't, however, believe this gives them an excuse to participate in whatever they want just because they "feel" like doing it.

 

[lAmebAdger]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

but ***ness evidently is a case in which it's allowed


i'd think that it goes in the direction of freedom of religion or opinion or something

 

[Johnny]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

kelptomaniacs, nymphomaniacs, pyromaniacs, ect.)

criminal, sexual deviant and criminal. Oh yeah your views on homosexuality is no secret, bible boy.

 

[Tanooki]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

There's a quote I heard once: If it was illegal to be a Christian, would there be enough proof to convict you?

I know you meant it to be an insult, but that's quite a compliment Johnny

 

[Johnny]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

If it was illegal to be a Christian, would there be enough proof to convict you?

It's not as deep and profound as you think it is.

 

[stillman]

Re: Are *** men better singers?

Krischan,

I'm blaming the man too, not just the woman. The man was supposed to provide for her during the pregnancy instead of her working her stressful job as usual.

The thing that bothers me is this: It's only nine months. That is only a brief time compared to the years of a young male homosexual's life where he must go through the teasing, namecalling, coming out of the closet, etc. All this turmoil because the parents can't take nine months to ensure a normal pregnancy.

(THEN, the parents blame their son for his behavior sometimes when it was their fault. THEN, the parents ask themselves, "Was it something that I did that made him turn out this way?" Yes, it was. It was 100% the parents' doing.)

Es Mors, I'll work on getting some sort of sorce to post. The source I am using is rather old literature. It may be hard to find electronic material.