Latest Diablo 3 News
DiabloWiki Updates
Support the site! Become a Diablo: IncGamers PAL - Remove ads and more!

Amnesty International Report for 2005

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Syxx, May 27, 2005.

  1. Syxx

    Syxx IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    466
    Amnesty International Report for 2005

    Hi All,

    I was looking at Amnesty International report for 2005 and was rather surprised at how much USA features.

    I expected to see certain African, Middle Eastern, ex Eastern Bloc, South American countries in the report, but not that USA would feature so promenantly.

    For a country that has often in recent events tried to take the moral high ground ..... this report seems to chop the legs out from such a stance.

    http://web.amnesty.org/report2005/usa-summary-eng

    What do people think of Amnesty International and its report. Do you think they it is fair and unbias ?

    Regards
    Syxx
     
  2. Johnny

    Johnny Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  3. DrunkCajun

    DrunkCajun Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    5,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think the Neo-Cons will laugh this off and declare it bogus nonsense. Since when has the right wing in the US cared about the lives of anyone other than it's own citizens?
     
  4. kberger

    kberger IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2004
    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Amnesty's William Schultz called Guantanamo the "gulag of our time." Stalin's gulags were death camps for POWs who were sent there. Terrorists are being detained at Guantanamo, who may be getting some rough treatment but the analogy to a gulag is ridiculous. I laugh and declare Amnesty's report bogus nonsense.
     
  5. Freemason

    Freemason Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Amnesty International has a long history of anti-americanism. Why should anybody be suprised they say we're the rottenest of the rotten while they give a pass to the scum of the Earth?
     
  6. Croup

    Croup IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,063
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    165
    This still isn't a refutation of the claims that Amnesty is making. Disagree with them as you might, and I surely do on some issues, this is not something that you can dismiss with a wave of the hand because it's from a source you dislike.
     
  7. jmervyn

    jmervyn IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    15,277
    Likes Received:
    367
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Smeg, you forgot your citation...
    http://www.discoverthenetwork.com/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6185

    Amnesty used to have a slightly better track record, but that was some time ago (like Greenpeace & the Cousteau Society). Like many other groups, it is far safer to stick fingers in the eyes of countries that won't chop their fingers off for trying.
     
  8. Steve_Kow

    Steve_Kow Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Messages:
    2,860
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I can certainly understand the government caring nearly exclusively for its own citizens. Idealism aside, that's what you and I pay our taxes for--to have somebody in our corner looking out for us. This isn't a notion that is unique to America either, I don't think that the "compassion" of Britains socialized NHS would apply to me. I imagine they'd tell me to "bugger off" as soon as they heard my accent.
     
  9. Stevinator

    Stevinator IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Messages:
    5,003
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    347
    sure we can.


    hmm, I don't like amnesty international.
    *waves hand*
    *decides not to care*
    *yawns*
    *grabs beer from fridge*
    *turns on desperate housewives*

    mmm, that pregnant chic is hot.

    *drools*

    see, there. just like that.
     
  10. Croup

    Croup IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,063
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    165
    Man, if you're going to make your point, at least don't choose the chick that's preggers.

    Joking aside (for now), I agree that it is within our capacity to simply ignore this report. And jmervyn, I take the point that you're making with that article. Amnesty went off the deep end a while ago when it comes to their analysis. To AI, America is the cause of all the world's problems and is itself the biggest and most vile human rights offender. And I completely disagree with that.

    However, that does not mean that their raw data is incorrect. Again, just because you dislike Amnesty and their agenda, that does not mean that you should simply ignore the information that they provide. Strangely enough, all of their diatribe has to come from somewhere, and if it's documented evidence like in much of their report, it's definitely something that matters.

    At least meet me halfway here people.
     
  11. Cerberus

    Cerberus IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    My first thought is what reason AI have for being biased in this report. Its not like they're a likely target for terrorist actions or anything and they do have a history of pointing out human rights violations in middle-eastern, africa and so on.

    I would like really like to hear a defintion of anti-americanism, if AI is guilty of it.
     
  12. Croup

    Croup IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,063
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    165
    To be fair, AI has a tendency to be overly harsh in its criticism of Western powers, especially the United States. This is not to say that they are unfounded, just that they go at least a touch overboard in their attempts to point out the US's follies.

    As for their reasoning, it can be any number of things. Overexaggeration so that people might "wake up" and see what's going on, drawing attention to abuses, anti-Bush administration, anti-military, etc. There are any number of reasons that are available to them in order to justify their sensationalism.

    But, as I said before, that still does not excuse people from looking at the raw data that AI provides. And there is PLENTY to go around in that category.
     
  13. Cerberus

    Cerberus IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    145
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Wow!
    No comment necessary. Answered all my questions (or what I was drawing the attention to)!
    I'll see what gets posted, and see if I can come up what something in the "plenty to go around category ;)
     
  14. Johnny

    Johnny Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  15. Machina

    Machina IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,425
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Generally the NHS is free at the point of use, any and all get treated (including foreigners), if you can stand the long wait for a second rate service like everyone else that is...

    There are certain treatments that almost everyone has to pay for though.
     
  16. jmervyn

    jmervyn IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    15,277
    Likes Received:
    367
    Trophy Points:
    498
    I'll definitely meet you halfway on that one. The fact that Abu Graib & so on could and should have been handled better, I doubt anyone (even Smeg) would deny. Of course, 'handled better' might mean 'handled more quietly' to some... :)

    And no, in case one of the usual suspects tries to throw mud, I'm not wishing it was handled more quietly. However, we should have never given the dirtbags in Gitmo the Quran's in the first place; it was just asking for trouble. It isn't like a large number of them know how to read in the first place.

    And for those same ususal suspects who will now accuse me of making anti-Islamic slurs, didya know that the Soviets disguised some of their toy/bombs as fountain pens, since ownership of a pen in Afghanistan was viewed as a mark of prestige? The concept of literacy... and people wonder why these mullahs wield so much power.
     
  17. jmervyn

    jmervyn IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2003
    Messages:
    15,277
    Likes Received:
    367
    Trophy Points:
    498
  18. DrunkPotHead

    DrunkPotHead IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    466
    You should watch Jon Stuart's Daily show sometime. Two days ago, they had a clip of the administration dismissing the report as bogus. Then right after, they had a clip of 2003 in which Rumsfeld used some report of Amnesty International's report for some kind of justification for something (i forgot what). Nice of him to be hypocritical and cherry-pick his data.
     
  19. Geeno

    Geeno IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    346
    Amnesty International is hardly a credible source. Just ask our president, vice president, and just about anyone else concerned.
     
  20. Darnoc

    Darnoc IncGamers Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    All politicians do that crap; they use what data and sources help them at the time regardless of their party affiliation. Plus, you say adiministration, was it specifically rummy who denounced it as bogus?

    As to the topic at hand regarding Amnesty, maybe they are just reporting the information given to them; it doesnt mean that the data given to them is correct though:

    http://www.techcentralstation.com/060305B.html

    I thought the terrorist handbook quotes were quite revealing of the stuation at hand and how terrorists are undermining the war in many ingenious ways.
     

Share This Page