11% of Gitmo releasees re-terrorize

S Z

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: 11% of Gitmo releasees re-terrorize

Gosh. I leave for a few months, post a disagreeing response and jmervyn lables me a Troofer. I'm glad to see such thoughtful analysis is alive and well in the OTF [/snark].


Anyway, about that 11%:

The Seton Hall Center for Policy and Research has issued a report which rebuts and debunks the most recent claim by the Department of Defense (DOD) that “61, in all, former Guantánamo detainees are confirmed or suspected of returning to the fight.â€

Professor Denbeaux of the Center for Policy & Research has said that the Center has determined that “DOD has issued 'recidivism' numbers 43 times, and each time they have been wrong—this last time the most egregiously so.â€

Denbeaux stated: “Once again, they’ve failed to identify names, numbers, dates, times, places, or acts upon which their report relies. Every time they have been required to identify the parties, the DOD has been forced to retract their false IDs and their numbers. They have included people who have never even set foot in Guantánamo—much less were they released from there. They have counted people as 'returning to the fight' for their having written an Op-ed piece in the New York Times and for their having appeared in a documentary exhibited at the Cannes Film Festival. The DOD has revised and retracted their internally conflicting definitions, criteria, and their numbers so often that they have ceased to have any meaning—except as an effort to sway public opinion by painting a false portrait of the supposed dangers of these men.

"Forty-three times they have given numbers—which conflict with each other—all of which are seriously undercut by the DOD statement that 'they do not track' former detainees. Rather than making up numbers “willy-nilly†about post release conduct, America might be better served if our government actually kept track of them.â€
On the page is a link to their report in full. Sure makes interesting reading.

(how long before 'someone' says the NYT is in Al'Queda's pocket...?)
 

Dondrei

Diabloii.Net Member
Re: 11% of Gitmo releasees re-terrorize

What does "re-terrorise" mean? I can only presume they're talking about going back to Iraq or Afghanistan and re-joining the militants.

This is all ********.

P.S. This thread is lame, I'm only posting because I saw SZ here.

And let's not forget he mentioned "re-terrorize". Just because they don't go on to terrorize again, doesn't mean they never did in the first place.

Even with this in mind, however, I must say that if the government has evidence, they should use it in a trial. If they don't have evidence, they should let them go. None of this "we have evidence but we won't show it to anyone".
But these are bad guys.



 
Top